Re: Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- From: Jim in Houston <nospamjamesgoodum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:22:05 -0500
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:27:24 -0500, "Jim Oberg"
<joberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It looks ugly, but maybe there are some simple tricks...Another thought, If the problematic SARJ is defective, and if P6
requires replacement, wouldn't that mean adding two more flights?
This, of course, would mean extending Shuttle ops to 2011?
Regards,
Jim in Houston.
Contrary to popular opinion RN does not mean Real Nerd!
Teddy Roosevelt's mother said: "Fill what is empty,
empty what is full, and scratch where it itches"
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- References:
- Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- From: Jim Oberg
- Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- Prev by Date: Soyuz vs Progress
- Next by Date: Re: Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- Previous by thread: Re: Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- Next by thread: Re: Solar Array deploy crisis -- torn panel -- let's look at options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading