Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- From: "Jim Oberg" <jameseoberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:34:12 GMT
I totally concur. Thanks for corroboration.
"hop" <hellsownpuppy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
If it is truly an external cover, this sounds like something that might
be repairable with an EVA (earlier reports implied the failure was a
propellant valve, which seems like it would be a lot nastier to work
on). Or for that matter, it might be a sensor failure, or an issue that
could be worked around with different procedures (random speculation:
opening the cover in a different thermal environment or giving the
actuator more current or more time to open.)
They also note that a reboost using only one of the SM main engine is
still possible.
.
- References:
- ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails
- From: Jim Oberg
- Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- From: Jim Oberg
- Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- From: hop
- ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails
- Prev by Date: Re: Service Module ThrusterTest Fails - Thrusters May be OK Anyway
- Next by Date: Re: Service Module ThrusterTest Fails - Thrusters May be OK Anyway
- Previous by thread: Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- Next by thread: Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|