Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- From: Chris Bennetts <benetsc2000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:54:03 +1000
Jim Oberg wrote:
"Even if the engines never work, they are only a backup to propulsion capability usually provided by visiting vehicles docked to the aft port," he explained in an e-mail. "The loss of these engines has no impact on station operations - the Russians were just curious if they would work after so long, and they have their answer."
Losing a backup system has always got to be a Bad Thing (although Mir spent nearly its entire life in the same situation, but for a different reason).
It makes you wonder what other long-term dormant systems no longer work. The failure of P6's array extension/retraction system would be extremely bad, for example.
--Chris
.
- References:
- ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails
- From: Jim Oberg
- Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- From: Jim Oberg
- ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails
- Prev by Date: NASA TV COVERS ARRIVAL OF RESUPPLY SHIP TO SPACE STATION
- Next by Date: Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- Previous by thread: Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- Next by thread: Re: ISS Service Module Thruster Test Fails -- first story on line
- Index(es):