Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- From: "Neil Gerace" <geracen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:04:11 +0800
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9789D21C517A9jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Science per dollar" by what metric? Comparing Apollo to *all* the robotic
probes, US and Soviet, Apollo got about 90% of the money spent on lunar
exploration in the 60's, but returned 90% or greater of all the surface
samples, photographs, etc.
ISTM that the cost of ISS + Suitsat was near-as-dammit the same as ISS
alone. Therefore a (briefly) working satellite was built and launched for
essentially zero dollars.
Trying to do something to see whether it can be done is very good science.
Doing it for approximately zero dollars is good economics. I'm not sure, but
I think they would have had to chuck the thing out sooner or later anyway.
.
- References:
- Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- Prev by Date: Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- Next by Date: Space station construction question
- Previous by thread: Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- Next by thread: Re: Suitsat radio dead; 'glovesat' lives on
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|