Re: new horizons
- From: richard schumacher <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:08:32 -0600
In article <Cqvzf.21754$Di.19210@trnddc06>,
"JUSTIN PENNELLA" <1000rronweasley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why only do a fly-by with the New Horizons spacecraft? I know the
> capabilities of this spacecraft are light years beyond the Voyagers and
> Pioneers (in terms of fly-bys), but why not just go ahead and put the craft
> into orbit around Pluto for long term study?
*smack* Why didn't we think of that?!?
Using chemically-fuelled rockets, the fuel required to slow down and
enter orbit is prohibitive. It takes roughly one thousand kilos of fuel
to set one kilo of spacecraft on its way to Pluto. Slowing the
spacecraft down at Pluto would take about the same 1000:1 ratio.
Putting a 500 kilo spacecraft into orbit around Pluto would thus require
launching a 500 million kilo chemical rocket. There ain't no such
animal.
.
- References:
- new horizons
- From: JUSTIN PENNELLA
- new horizons
- Prev by Date: Re: Photos from Pluto
- Next by Date: Re: Photos from Pluto
- Previous by thread: Re: new horizons
- Next by thread: Re: new horizons
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading