Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 06:24:19 -0500
"josephus" <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13j7v48a5v6dn3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George wrote:
"josephus" <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageok
news:13j49fuo8thpia3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
TeaWrecks wrote:
<orangatang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193552207.930268.74450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 26 Oct, 15:00, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
have to disagree. mammals don't lay eggs.
Mammals also dont have an avian respiratory system, avian bone
structure and
morpholgy, scleral rings, feathers, such highly specialized nesting
behavior, and any number of things that I'm sure I've missed
platypus is a warm blooded furred web footed critter that lays eggs. it
is also a marsupial
josephus
Umm, the platypus is a monotreme.
George
I thought it was in the group with marsupials.
josephus
No problem, Joe.
George
.
- References:
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: TeaWrecks
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: George
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Prev by Date: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by Date: Jacobs Photos: Bear or not?
- Previous by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by thread: Re: The AGW Crowd Are Mad And Don't Know It!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|