Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:18:24 -0600
George wrote:
"josephus" <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:13j49fuo8thpia3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxok
TeaWrecks wrote:
<orangatang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193552207.930268.74450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 26 Oct, 15:00, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
have to disagree. mammals don't lay eggs.
Mammals also dont have an avian respiratory system, avian bone structure and
morpholgy, scleral rings, feathers, such highly specialized nesting
behavior, and any number of things that I'm sure I've missed
platypus is a warm blooded furred web footed critter that lays eggs. it is also a marsupial
josephus
Umm, the platypus is a monotreme.
George
I thought it was in the group with marsupials.
josephus
--
I go sailing in the Summer and
look at STARS in the Winter.
"Everybody is igernant, jist on differt subjects"
Will Rogers Jr.
"it aint what you know that gets you in trouble
it is what you know that aint so"
Josh Billings.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: TeaWrecks
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: George
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Prev by Date: Re: Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious
- Next by Date: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Previous by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|