Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:18:15 -0500
"josephus" <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13j49fuo8thpia3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
TeaWrecks wrote:
<orangatang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageplatypus is a warm blooded furred web footed critter that lays eggs. it
news:1193552207.930268.74450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 26 Oct, 15:00, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
have to disagree. mammals don't lay eggs.
Mammals also dont have an avian respiratory system, avian bone structure
and
morpholgy, scleral rings, feathers, such highly specialized nesting
behavior, and any number of things that I'm sure I've missed
is also a marsupial
josephus
Umm, the platypus is a monotreme.
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: TeaWrecks
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Prev by Date: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by Date: Re: Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious
- Previous by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|