Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: Peter Bowditch <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:48:34 GMT
orangatang1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 26 Oct, 15:00, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
have to disagree. mammals don't lay eggs.
Unless they are echidnas or platypuses.
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
.
- References:
- 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: orangatang1
- 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein's Aether
- Next by Date: Re: Update on the photos (was "Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?")
- Previous by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by thread: Morphogenetic Fields and Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
