Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?

One more thing I thought I might throw in here.

Although I never said the photos _WERE_ of Bigfoot,
or even that Bigfoot existed, I was keeping it open that it
_might_ still exist. There is no place for dogmatism
in science -- and that includes dogmatic denial as well
as dogmatic acceptance. Neither are permissible and
that is why I wanted to give these photos a fair shake.
Maybe it wasn't Bigfoot in the end, but that's not the
point.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... Yet you began this thread by titling it "Bigfoot ... photos: real or fake". ... "YAWN - we've seen this all before" attitude is therefore not dogmatism, ... yesterday's crap is generally still crap. ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... There is no place for dogmatism ... it is against the type of evidence you ... What is the object in those photos? ... Everyone's raving that it's Bigfoot, ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... Although I never said the photos _WERE_ of Bigfoot, ... There is no place for dogmatism ... it is against the type of evidence you ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: Amhof Trucking
    ... bigfoot... ... and the loch ness ... kinda strange all your photos are supposed to be of ... > dont bother running your cocksucker unless you plan on quality ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... And if they got that close to a 'bigfoot' why the hell didn't they ... He used a Bushnell trail camera, though it is named on the ... times the pixels in the photos at issue here -- featuring ... it was just to hunt game! ...
    (sci.skeptic)