Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:06:37 -0400
"josephus" <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13i636t8581hldc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lin Liangtai wrote:
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleate
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
See "5,000X, negative-effect" SEM photos at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=12
Meanwhile, please be informed that I did an EDS analysis before
taking
SEM photos. The EDS report states that the specimen contains 53% (by
weight) of Fe, 33% of Silica, 9% of Aluminium.
Those chemical composition does not indicate an iron stone or any rock.
53% by weight iron is definitely an ironstone. I've seen analysese of
ironstones that had much less iron than this. If it is
sedimentary/concretionary in origin, and the dominant elementary
composition is iron, it is an ironstone. Next.
George
.
- References:
- 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus
- 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Prev by Date: Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Next by Date: About Gravity, Inertia and Mass
- Previous by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Index(es):