Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:59:44 -0500
Lin Liangtai wrote:
High resolution SEM microscopies clearly show concave and anucleateand they dont look animal at all. any criter with that arrangement
red blood cells of Jurassic dinosaurs. So, dinosaurs were certainly
mammals.
See "5,000X, negative-effect" SEM photos at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=12
Meanwhile, please be informed that I did an EDS analysis before
taking
SEM photos. The EDS report states that the specimen contains 53% (by
weight) of Fe, 33% of Silica, 9% of Aluminium.
Those chemical composition does not indicate an iron stone or any rock.
would be poisoned.
just where do you get those red blood cells. oh, I see you have some
rock blood cells and any reputable phlebotomist will laugh at you.
besides too much silica and the blood is just stone.
josephus
--
I go sailing in the Summer and
look at STARS in the Winter.
"Everybody is igernant, jist on differt subjects"
Will Rogers Jr.
"it aint what you know that gets you in trouble
it is what you know that aint so"
Josh Billings.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- From: Lin Liangtai
- 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Prev by Date: Re: Update on the photos (was "Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?")
- Next by Date: Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Previous by thread: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Next by thread: Re: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
