Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?

On Oct 25, 11:30 pm, Bryan Olson <fakeaddr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mike3 wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
He used a Bushnell trail camera, though it is named on the
bfro.net cite as a "Bushell" trail camera. Looking it up, I
find one can now get their 1.3 MP (megapixel) camera -- thats
2.7 times the pixels in the photos at issue here -- featuring
motion activation and 30 day battery life, for about $100.
For better images, a 2.1 MP version is $125; a 3 MP model
jumps to around $350.

Of course he could have. But like I said, why would he
have the need to: his intent was never to prove Bigfoot
exists, it was just to hunt game!

Sounds like we are arguing in violent agreement. The
cameras are fine -- better than ever. Still no Bigfoot.


Nope, not on these photos at least.

[...]

I find that impressive. Back when I got my "Maryland Safe
Hunter" certification, there was no such product. Putting
such a system together would have cost a fortune.
Mass-production makes sophisticated stuff amazingly
inexpensive. Hunters can now easily afford the equipment
to get the images to help them easily find the game.

But if that camera was serving his purposes well enough,
why would he want to scrap it for a new one?

Or are you just annoyed that the photos are of
low quality?

No idea what you're on about.


What was all this stuff then about having a better
camera?

So how come no one has found Bigfoot for real? Why is the
1967 Patterson film -- that looks like we'd expect a guy in
a monkey suit to look -- still the best pro-Bigfoot evidence?
The parks are much more popular today, and there are vastly
more cameras about. Hmmm... could we figure out a clue in
there?

Who says that Bigfoot must have to go to parks?

"Must have to"? Again, I cannot tell what you are on
about. Nonexistent creatures do not have to do anything,
but check out what the Bigfoot fans do actually say.


You were making an assumption about this "nonexistent"
creature, talking about "parks" being more popular, which
I interpreted as you saying that if it existed it should
be seen there.

Where did you think they say they saw the critter?
Patterson shot his film, widely hailed by BF-believers
as the their best evidence ever, in Six Rivers National
Forest. The photos at issue here are reportedly by a
recreational hunter who was looking for game.

How many people have cameras with them during
all the times when they claim to have seen Bigfoot?
Those are the things I'd like to look at.

You could face reality.

I haven't yet, even though I think the photo might be
a bear?

More and more cameras in the
places where Bigfoot is supposed to be. No Bigfoot.

You said you wanted clues. Taken any yet?


Lots of them.

--
--Bryan


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... And if they got that close to a 'bigfoot' why the hell didn't they ... He used a Bushnell trail camera, though it is named on the ... times the pixels in the photos at issue here -- featuring ... it was just to hunt game! ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... bfro.net cite as a "Bushell" trail camera. ... Still no Bigfoot. ... Hunter" certification, ... to get the images to help them easily find the game. ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
    ... >> For slightly more than $100 you can now buy a traditional film camera ... And if they got that close to a 'bigfoot' why the hell didn't they ... bfro.net cite as a "Bushell" trail camera. ... Hunters can now easily afford the equipment ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: OT - Is Bigfoot Real or a Hoax?
    ... Of course it seems that way, but there is a lot of photos and videos out there for so many years now. ... any creature that wanders around in the Pacific Northwest and is that big and distinct would easily be seen many times - no less often at least than people see bears or wolves. ... That's an interesting point, but Bigfoot should have better intelligent then bears, and prefers to be reclusive I would think, hiding from mankind, as where bears don't really fear man or the camera. ... You make it sound like Bigfoot never leaves his cave without infrared cameras and night goggles and uses real-time satellite imagery to avoid every new camper or hiker or hunter that happens to wander into Bigfoot's neck of the woods and is always one step ahead of every single one. ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: 20 Years and Still Going
    ... My idea was to use the digital P&S for life documentation type shots, and my film cameras for my "wannabe professional" stuff. ... This camera lasted about 1400 shots and just out of warranty before it died - it would drain a set of batteries in about 1 minute flat. ... Once again though, I was never happy with the quality of the R707, the old Kodak DC3400 took better quality photos, despite the lower megapixel rating. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)