Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:35:58 -0400
"mike3" <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1193287065.173110.195290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 24, 1:54 pm, george <gbl...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 25, 7:43 am, mike3 <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But I didn't say that. I didn't say, BIGFOOT, BIGFOOT,
BIGFOOT!!!! WOOHOOO!!!!! It was a curious photo.
Far from a "smoking gun" proof of anything.
What annoys the hell out of me is the pisspoor quality of the camera
gear that these 'researchers' use.
That's because the guy was not a researcher or even pretending
to be one. He was a hunter wanting to hunt deer. You can read
that on the site. So then of course he would not be using a high-
quality camera. You don't NEED a high quality camera to hunt
deer!
Odd. I don't know anyone who uses a camera, high quality or otherwise, to
hunt dear. I do know quite a few who use rifles and crossbows. :-)
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: george
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- References:
- Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: george
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: george
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: george
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Prev by Date: Re: Update on the photos (was "Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?")
- Next by Date: 5,000X SEM shows dinosaurs' red blood cells had no nuclei
- Previous by thread: Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Next by thread: Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|