Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: "TeaWrecks" <paulvruggeri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:49:46 -0400
"Albert Worschey" <"worldwar666[at]gmail.com"> wrote in message
news:gumdnRErdsfrjIDanZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mike3 wrote:
That's the question.
I recently saw some photos called the "Jacobs Photos" that allege
to show a Bigfoot or similar creature. What's your opinion on it?
Does it look like a hoax? Go and google up "Jacobs Photos Bigfoot"
to find them (no quotes).
One of the photos shows a bear cub as well for comparison.
What do you make of it?
His feetses are too small.
That's 'footses'..
If the creatures in the 2nd & 3rd photos look like anything, they look like
starving adolescent bears; gangly and skinny, making the legs appear to be
excessivley long, in a badly lit and exposed photograph.
A sort of unrelated question:
The website at bfro.net says "Juvenile bigfoots are typically described as
quadrupedal (walking on four legs)". When did the notion of quadrupedal
juvenile sasquatch enter the pantheon of bigfoot belief?
--
Albert Worschey
.
- References:
- Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- From: Albert Worschey
- Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Next by Date: Tell.
- Previous by thread: Re: Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?
- Next by thread: Update on the photos (was "Bigfoot photos: Real or Fake?")
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
