Re: What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- From: Lizz Holmans <dillo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:59:06 +0100
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:41:14 GMT, Bryan Olson
<fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lizz Holmans wrote:
mike3 wrote:
Everyone seems to argue about fundamentalist religion,
so what about _non_-fundamentalist religion? It's out there.
So what's your opinion on it, and why don't you discuss
it more?
That's why they keep me around.
Plus we're still hoping to recruit you. You seem
reasonable enough, most of the time, and we need
more atheists with they call "people skills".
Happy where you are? Sure, no hard-sell. The offer
is open in case you reconsider.
Quakers don't proselytize. Some atheists do That's the mainest
difference.
Lizz 'besides God and stuff' Holmans
--
Rumpeta, rumpeta, rumpeta
.
- References:
- What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- From: mike3
- Re: What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- From: Lizz Holmans
- Re: What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- From: Bryan Olson
- What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- Prev by Date: Re: What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- Next by Date: planetarium
- Previous by thread: Re: What about *non*-fundamentalist religion?
- Next by thread: planetarium
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
