Lying from the math community

If you read my previous post then you know that my position is that
mathematicians act as a community as cons, lying about mathematics.

Consider that today in our great modern age where computers dominate so
many areas of our lives, they are not setup to check most mathematical
arguments that people in the math community claim are proofs i.e.
absolutely true.

Without computers to check we rely on the word of people who are part
of the same cmmunity, with shared interests.

Millions of dollars in research money flow based on their word.

And I suggest to you that they lie.

Unfortunately such a huge charge against such an influential community
is hard to prove, but I may now have the proof in the factoring
problem.

Mathematicians proclaimed factoring to be difficult, and built a
security system around that position.

I suggest to you they screwed up--because they are frauds, and not real
mathematicians.

The nice thing about such a charge is that you do not have to believe
me, but the unfortunate thing is that the proof may be your poverty.

If you have stocks, and think yourself wealthy now, but in a few days
are broken and penniless, then there will be no question of proof.

So why make a post like this one?

I don't know, maybe I'm myself simply amazed that such a situation is
possible so I find myself chatting up about it.

They ARE frauds, and have lied with claims of major proofs, while
ignoring major research, and not just mine.

Think you know the math community?

Do a web search on Anatoly Plotnikov, a mathematician who may have
proven before the rise of RSA that it was inherently insecure by
proving something called P=NP.

The evidence is out there, and it's not just my say-so.

These people may have ignored his research to promote their community,
to promote the idea that they could provide value, when what they
provided was security based on ignorance, and blind trust.

Now, open your eyes.


James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • "Loyalty to a Research Aesthetic: Its Practical Consequences for a Virtual Applied Math R&D
    ... requisite pure and applied mathematicians will ... community an intangible, ... ii) H.S.M Coxeter made this linkage "come ... community of pure and applied mathematicians contains ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Unfair burden
    ... Surrogate factoring is my answer to a math community that does not ... Mathematicians are still fighting to ignore my research which pushes ... IN answer I get lies about even the most basic mathematics so that the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Explaining the huge math error
    ... experienced members of the physics community of the existence of the ... integers became widely used by mathematicians in the late 1800's. ... Pupa JSH, there is no problem. ... Yes, other journals were contacted, other papers were written to no ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: JSH: Unfair burden
    ... Mathematicians are still fighting to ignore my research ... go to get to encrytion level factoring. ... objections and it has not mattered to a math community that refuses to ... IN answer I get lies about even the most basic mathematics so that the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: New way to factor?
    ... If I am right, then mathematicians will do--nothing. ... If they acknowledge my research they are outed as frauds as I am a ... Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, ... head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE". ...
    (sci.physics)