Re: TOP TEN SIGNS YOU'RE A ATHEIST

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:18:18 -0700, in sci.skeptic, "I don't believe in
atheists" <Athiests@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>TOP TEN SIGNS YOU'RE A ATHEIST
>
>10 - You vigorously deny the existence of the only god claimed and supported
>by the only true religion, but feel outraged when
>someone denies the existence of atheism.

What "true religion"?


>9 - You feel enlightened and "humanized" when scientists say that people
>evolved from other life forms, but you have a huge problem with the Biblical
>claim that we were created by GOD.

Which god? which god in the bible?

>8 - You laugh at theists, but you have no problem believing in order out of
>chaos.

This doesn't make sense. I see Chaos all around. There is a order to
disorder. A disorder to order.

>7 - you don't flinch when hearing about how atheists slaughtered all the
>babies of China and Russia in the history books and ordered the
>elimination of entire ethnic groups in Cambodia and other countries including
>women and children!

But then do you flinch when reading about the millions of more people
tortured and killed by the religious people, I guess you forgot the acts of
the Catholics and religious on the native people in the americans? How about
the spanish and french inquisitions? The crusades? Did you know "faith based
schools exist and were supported by the government up and until the late
1950's where Native American children were "tortured and deprogramed" by
religious christians?

>6 - You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about
>gods sleeping with women, and you laugh and villify
>people believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth
>to a man-god who was crucified for our sins,came back to life and then
>ascended into heaven.

I laugh at all silly superstitions.

>5 - You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the
>scientifically established age of Earth, and you find everything wrong with
>believing dates recorded by Bronze Age scientists sitting in their homes
>and stating the age of the earth.

Sounds like the "anti-science" arm of the "religious people has been active
again.

>4 - You believe that the entire population of this planet have no souls
>including those in all rival sects of secular humanism- and will
>spend Eternity in blackness and devoid of any purpose.

What is a soul?
What evidence do you have?

Try this: You believe that the entire population of this planet have no
"fpithcomb" including those in all rival sects of secular humanism- and will
spend Eternity in blackness and devoid of any purpose.

substitute any word or sound for the word "fpithcomb" and see if your
statement makes any sense.

>3 - While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed
>to convince you otherwise, some idiot out to save his
>paycheck and tenure rolling around on the floor speaking like a talking
>monkey gloriying evilution may be
>all the evidence you need to "prove" Atheism.

While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed
to convince you otherwise, some idiot out to save his paycheck by rolling
around on the floor, speaking in tongues, or standing at a pulpit glorifying
a silly superstition of a soul and promising you a fictional carrot, if you
only believe, may be all the evidence you need to "prove" god exists.

>2 - You define 0.01% as a "high success rate" when it comes to atheist
>evidence for no God.
>You consider that to be evidence that atheism works. And you
>think that the remaining 99.99% SUCCESS was simply chance.

Hun... That makes no sense.

>1 - You actually know a lot less than many theists and agnostics do about
>the Bible, Christianity, and church history - but still call yourself an atheist.

I know religious believing people especially organized religious people are
bad.

The man down there street keeps hearing voices that tell him to hurt, kill,
maim other people: 1. is he listening to god 2. is he crazy 3. is he
listening to preachers on the radio?


--
Ak'toh'di
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: AiG goes after Francis Collins
    ... principles is incompatible with what science tells us about the world. ... the idea that God speaks directly to any person, ... any "is" claims must be accompanied by evidence. ... was that the proper domain of religion is "ought" claims only. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: GOD says: were they created from nothing? or they were them selves the creators??
    ... enriched this group when s/he wrote: ... as there is nothing in the way of evidence to seperate any ... religion produced concrete evidence then things would be different. ... The is NO evidence for god. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Richard Dawkins
    ... Anemia is deficiency; asymmetry is no symmetry; atheism is no God. ... There are many Christians who do indeed ... jobs where religion played no part. ...
    (rec.scouting.issues)
  • Re: OT - Oh, so OT.
    ... atheism is the lack of belief in god or gods. ... evidence to believe, and that one is simply not making the same conclusion ... and not allowing mixing of standard religion ... with politics is NOT forcing the "religion" of atheism on anyone. ...
    (comp.lang.php)
  • Re: Re: GOD says: were they created from nothing? or they were them selves the creators??
    ... enriched this group when s/he wrote: ... as there is nothing in the way of evidence to seperate any ... religion produced concrete evidence then things would be different. ... The is NO evidence for god. ...
    (talk.origins)