Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- From: BMJ <parametric_equation@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:26:16 GMT
Russell.Martin@xxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
That wasn't my take on it. What I read was that they had bought into
the old idea that a "good" career meant lots of upward mobility and if you
weren't promoted on a regular basis then you were stagnate. I used to think
that too, or at least wonder about it. But in my career I never saw it
actually implemented. Very few of my coworkers were promoted and none had
regular promotions. Everybody I have ever known moved up the "company ladder"
by changing companies. I've seen a few coworkers actually get screwed by
being handed a pretty title and more responsibility and no salary increase.
I've gained more responsibility and respect over the years, but I'm
still a computer programmer or software engineer. In working closely with
middle management, I've seen the crap they have to deal with and I don't want
any part of it. I am ambitious, but I'm also ethical and I simply don't see
any room for ethical managers in corporate USA. I'm also willing to work hard
when it's really necessary to get a project done, but I'm not willing to work
80-hour weeks just to look busy. So I don't worry about promotions anymore.
- Sharon
"Gravity... is a harsh mistress!"
There is less room at the top of a pyramid than at
the bottom, so most people don't make VP or CEO
independent of generation and/or ethics You may
end up happier than some of your coworkers.
But being an upper-level manager has considerably more social value than being someone from the lower echelon.
.
Cheers,
Russell
- References:
- The "Grey Ceiling"
- From: Noel
- Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- From: BMJ
- Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- From: Sharon
- Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- From: Russell . Martin
- The "Grey Ceiling"
- Prev by Date: Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- Next by Date: Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- Previous by thread: Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- Next by thread: Re: The "Grey Ceiling"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|