Re: No future for S&E, IT jobs in the USA...

Straydog wrote:


On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Razor Face wrote:


"Straydog" <asd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.63.0604291854301.20877@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Saturday/Sunday, April 29-30 issue of WSJ, LTE column has a total of four
LETs all giving the opinion that there is no future for S&E jobs in the
USA. Y'all can look it up and read them yourselves. A bunch of us on s.r.c
already know this, but the media keeps spinnig out the propaganda that
there is a vast shortage of S&Es. Might be a vast shortage of S%E _jobs_
but not S&Es. One guy graduated with a Phd in chemistry, says he sent out
"several thousand" resumes and is still waiting for his first interview.


I don't understand how they can get away with a lie for so long. Why does
the media perpetuate this, instead of challanging the push for more H1Bs?



I'll give my speculations:

First, lobbying entities (eg. ITAA, which pushes for more H1bs, works for all the companies that want to hire the H1bs, L-1s, etc.) send out media kits to all the editors of the papers in the hopes that they publish "the 'party line'" on this, and many do.

Second, most of the line staff reporters don't have the time & resources to do any kind of decent "research job" and since it is hard to _find_ data on "the big lie", it tends to get "forgotten" in favor of the easy job of following the media kits sent out by the lobbying entities (who themselves kiss the ass of money).

Third, NSF (and the universities) also have a rationalization for perpetuating "the big lie": if Congress gets whiff of the idea that lots
of S&Es graduating are having trouble finding jobs, then Congress is gonna
cut NSF and granting agency (eg. also NIH, DoE, DoD, DoC) budgets for R&D
and that will be a threat to campus research revenue and expansion.


NSF's budget had the largest cut in the history of the organization last year. Over the last 5 years, NSF's budget has been in the toilet. Lots of young faculty are paying the price, including not getting tenure. DOE's budget was also pretty crappy until very recently. NIH had big budget increases, but now their budget is looking flat for the next few years.

There is a big distinction between the "need for more scientists" (which is defined as: people coming out of schools with degrees) and the "need for more scientists" (which is defined as funded _jobs_ in which scientific work is done, as the first and only priority, and salaries are paid under some circumstance where there will be a funding committment
for continuing that scientific work).

The guys I talk to in industry say there is an impending shortage of chemistry and chemical engineering PhD holders in the next decane. Most of their employees are around 50, with a small blip at 30.


A peripheral issue is how funded science is done. There are two ways. One, salary money is provided by the organization (i.e. the BMOs [=bosses, managers, owners]) and the progress evaluated by the BMOs (and if they are not happy for any reason, they fire the scientists, as in fire scientists in the USA and hire, eg., Indian and Chinese, and Russian, or anywhere cheaper [so if you are in the US, you can't win]). But our local BMOs, corporatized as they are, are becoming nothing but import agencies (have everything else done in China, India, etc.) and just import the product or services and pay outrageous compensation packages to the CEOs and executives and pay snot to the Indians-Chinese.

The other "model" for science is the Univeristy-Institute model where the "scientist" is really a faculty member who MAY have some teaching

At most universities, engineering faculty are teaching 3-4 courses per year. It's only at the "elite" universities that faculty get the luxury of teaching one class a year.

duty, but often WILL have responsibility to do his own fund-raising (i.e. get grants and contracts) as first priority and the actual science is done by graduate students and "post docs"

To be honest, in addition to finding money to pay students, I am the one who has to figure out what to do and how to do it. I'm very hands-on, although my advisor was a hands-off, sink or swim type.

(at--guess what--much lower
pay, no job security, no independence, and groveling and eeking out as much as possible a track record in the hopes of getting their own lab someday where they can play the role of "big kahuna" with a staff

Many engineering PhDs go to industry and do not fall into this pyramid scheme.

of--guess what--low paid underlings of their own) and so the new model has less to do with actually even doing science as it has to do with _fundraising_ (which I like to call _moneyharvesting_ which is what 21st century life in the west is all about these days).

Despite having to raise money through grant proposals, we manage to get plenty of science done. Frequently, we even have a good time doing it.


Now, there might be a little better deal in the govt, and govt-sponsored military labs (APL, LLNL, LANL, NSA, etc) where about 3/4 of the technical staff may have permanent jobs with high pay, high job security, etc. (I know some of these guys) but you also have to kiss up to "the system" too.

These guys have to apply for internal money, which is not always easy to come by. The productivity of the guys I know at national labs is very high.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: No future for S&E, IT jobs in the USA...
    ... LETs all giving the opinion that there is no future for S&E jobs in the ... Second, most of the line staff reporters don't have the time & resources to do any kind of decent "research job" and since it is hard to _find_ data on "the big lie", it tends to get "forgotten" in favor of the easy job of following the media kits sent out by the lobbying entities (who themselves kiss the ass of money). ... NSF's budget had the largest cut in the history of the organization last year. ... people coming out of schools with degrees) and the "need for more scientists" (which is defined as funded _jobs_ in which scientific work is done, as the first and only priority, and salaries are paid under some circumstance where there will be a funding committment ...
    (sci.research.careers)
  • Re: This recession said to be the worst in decades...
    ... They said the lab did not lay off people. ... and those people popped up in the govt jobs in the lab. ... I believe the lab's management created the positions for their cronies ... He says that the "junior scientists" can do jobs as good, ...
    (sci.research.careers)
  • Re: rumblings and musings
    ... scientists to get to work for them by saying that the young scientists ... Articles that I read indicate that there are definitely not enough jobs in China for scientists. ... I checked the Denmark natl lab website... ...
    (sci.research.careers)
  • Re: Now It Can Be Told
    ... that the underprivileged are somehow genetically inferior or different ... technology has replaced most of the jobs simpler minded ... Our county paper published DOE results of testing at a local high school. ... are never going to be rocket scientists or even computer programmers so ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Poor Darwin
    ... >>Certainly no scientists ever lost their jobs over the "Velikovsky ... >>that praised the book lost their jobs, and rightly so, in that they ... >>theory is slightly more credibible than anything Velikovsky said. ... There was also an argument early in the ID debate that proteins were ...
    (talk.origins)