Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: Straydog <asdf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:28:49 -0400
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Russell.Martin@xxxxxxx wrote:
Straydog wrote:On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Russell.Martin@xxxxxxx wrote:
BMJ wrote:Russell.Martin@xxxxxxx wrote:It somewhat depends on what one means by "fundamental". Since "electronics" depends somewhat on "electrons", one might argue that the "fundamental" discovery was that of the electron. :-)
Electronic devices existed before the transistor.
Well, then, quantum theory, or Franklin's observations on the nature of electricity, or the smelting of copper. :-)
Vacuum tubes were around decades before xistors. :-)
What was fundamentally different about the latter was how it was constructed and operated.
Solid state devices (diodes) existed before transistors.
Germanium diodes, and with wiskers.
Threeconnection amplifying devices existed before transistors.
Triodes.
BMJ is just enough younger than me that he might never have used a triode.
He didn't live. If you haven't loved, then you haven't lived. ;-)
Yeah, when I was a kid I got my hands on old TV set chassis, took appart, rebuilt into other things. I played with some of the old battery filament tubes. The octal sized 1G4s, 1H4s including triodes, and the seven pin miniaturs 1U4, 1T4, etc. mostly pentodes and tetrodes. They also had sub-miniature tubes about the size of two pensil erasers. Then the nuvistors came out (about the size of one pensil erasers, but I had one but did not ever use it). Acorn tubes were also battery filament tubes and, actually, the size of a real acorn. Yeah...they were all resistant to EMP, too, and our military were laughing at the stolen Russian MIG fighters with vaccum tube radios until they realized that all of our solid state radios could be melted with an atmospheric bomb burst. Then they did "hardening" which, I never found out, if it was going to do any good.
I was fortunate enough to be at the perfect
time to have learned to use a slide rule before switching to a digital calculator, learned to wire tubes, discrete solid state devices, and IC circuits, learned to plot a graph by hand, etc.
yeah... me too. Good for you. I also had a circular slide rule. And, I always wanted to get a cylindrical one (four decimal accuracy they said, 66" equivalent) and I only ever saw one in my life and they were not cheap.
I cut down trees with a stone ax to make my own
pencils, too. ;-)
Hey, I cut down the trees here to make a driveway. electric chain saw plus five deep cycle marine batteries in series. We didn't get electricity till the house was about 90% finished.
don't forget tetrodes, pentodes, and coverters.
Right, but triodes are the most analogous to transistors.
And, there ARE tetrode transistors, too. Now, there almost ain't no transistors any more....just chips.
Itcan be argued that transistors were merely a logical extension of those more "fundamental" devices.
Maybe a parallel there.
Developments in integrated circuits led to completely new manufacturing methods, which were quickly adopted by industry.
Certainly the rather obvious commercialpotential (and in some cases war efforts) pushed electronics faster than some other fields.
More than anything, it was the space race that drove the electronic industry.
You have not seen any of the popular magazines that existed well before the space race. Or, the big push for radio and TV, that also existed before the space race.
The biggest problem in going to the moon is weight andanything which could reduce the size of the payload and boosters was worth considering.
The Russians beat this problem by just making very big boosters.
I've read that, and I'd agree as far as miniturization per se, but commercial, consumer uses drove the industry before that and even after that as far as revenue goes.
There were portable battery operated radios that did not use transistors. And, they were not very big, either. Many of them. I had one, once.
So we have a question ofwhich came first, the revenue prospects or the cutting edge technology. I claim they are synergistic as far as advancing the industry as a whole goes. IOW the industry would not have advanced as far if the only market for small devices was low volume, high cost space applications, nor would it have advanced as far if those devices had not been developed for space applications.
I'm picking on everyone, today.
As they say on Wall Street, that's been discounted. ;-)
Oh, I can discount more if you want.
You should see how we get good deals when we buy cars. Don't tell BMJs former boss, though.
snip
.
- References:
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: rick++
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: old_pif
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: BMJ
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: Russell . Martin
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: BMJ
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: Russell . Martin
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: Straydog
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- From: Russell . Martin
- Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- Prev by Date: Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- Next by Date: some results
- Previous by thread: Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- Next by thread: Re: Watching the Economy Crumble
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|