Re: CASE CLOSED: No more mail MEANS "Taylor" has not shown who he is!!
- From: Angel <angel+news@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:11:57 -0000
On 2005-12-20, xxxdarb <xx35jolarbNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, "Taylor" (Joe Jared of Orange, CA):
> OK. The evidence is there. YOU HAVE NEVER HAD TO PROVE YOU WERE
> "Taylor Jimenez". THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER TO BELIEVE YOU
> ARE. The postmaster affirmed you signed without ANY identity
> check whatsoever. HE SAID YOU PROVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT IDENTITY
> UNTIL YOU receive REGISTERED MAIL and then must produce at least
> some ID to back your alias.
Then why didn't you send registered mail, Brad?
And why did you send it to Taylor when you claim that he doesn't even
exist?
--
Your friendly neighborhood *** Operator from Heaven. :-)
I spoke: "Let there be light!"
And behold! As soon as I threw the switch, there was light!
.
- Prev by Date: Taking bets on who the "legal representative" Brad will create when he sends more mail to me.
- Next by Date: Re: CASE CLOSED: Only decent evidence, SHOWS "Taylor Jimenez" IS Joe Jared
- Previous by thread: Taking bets on who the "legal representative" Brad will create when he sends more mail to me.
- Next by thread: Re: CASE CLOSED: Only decent evidence, SHOWS "Taylor Jimenez" IS Joe Jared
- Index(es):