Re: Adeiu, PT#9971. was: Re: Lynne Lyons you screwed up, again. :)

In article <436F83D6.CFC3911C@xxxxxxxxxxx>, equsphotogophr@xxxxxxxxxxx
(hoofprints) wrote:

>
>
> Alan wrote:
> >
> > In article <436F7C6C.D34CE375@xxxxxxxxxxx>, equsphotogophr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > (hoofprints) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In article <436F781F.229C631C@xxxxxxxxxxx>, equsphotogophr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > (hoofprints) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Kali wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In article <436E7CAC.579F25F@xxxxxxxxxxx>, posted Sun, 06 Nov
> > > > > > 2005 13:59:08 -0800, hoofprints equsphotogophr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > says...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Kali wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> In article <436E4CA3.3C34A1D4@xxxxxxxxxxx>, posted Sun, 06 Nov
> > > > > > >> 2005 10:34:11 -0800, hoofprints equsphotogophr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > >> says...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > snip
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >So instead of recognizing that you are wrong, and instead of
> > > > > > > taking
> > > > > > >> >action to change your own behavior, you fabricate and lie about
> > > > > > > my
> > > > > > >> >'motives' just so my complaint won't make it to those who sit in
> > > > > > >> >judgment of you.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Post proof that I have lied. One message ID will do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lack of evidence noted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> >I am not stalking you, I have never stalked you so all of your
> > > > > > >> >assertions are a protective measure on your part to avoid being
> > > > > > > judged
> > > > > > >> >by your own peers.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> See above.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >[SEE Above yourself] You took action to protect yourself
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Damn straight, you meddling old woman.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > w/o admitting
> > > > > > >you were wrong
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wasn't wrong. The only time I was wrong about you is when I
> > > > > > insisted, to the last few psychs left in spp, that you weren't
> > > > > > really a kook. Imagine that! But since your past caught up to
> > > > > > you in spp and you started threatening me, Dan, Peter, and
> > > > > > others, I've had you pegged for the vindictive old busy body you
> > > > > > are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and in fact have done nothing 'more' than 'twist' your
> > > > > > >behavior and focus on my reaction to your behavior.
> > > > > > >hoof.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Evidence of "twisting my behavior"(wtf)? I didn't think so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You know what, Lynne? I've realized something these past few
> > > > > > days, and that is that I've grown terribly bored dealing with
> > > > > > vile, stupid, lying, whacked out people like you,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you still certain you want to pursue a Ph.D in Psych? lol :/
> > > > > You don't want to deal with *vile, stupid, lying, whacked out
> > > > > people*.
> > > >
> > > > Yes :-) After all her sig-line says something about that too.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > who don't
> > > > > > deserve the chance to clean my toilets, let alone engage me this
> > > > > > way on Usenet. In real life, I'd have absolutely nothing to do
> > > > > > with someone who acts like you do. Usenet removes barriers that
> > > > > > are perhaps best left in place.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now Harry is gone, Dan is apparently tired of all this,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dna has periodic episodic outbursts, but for the most part I agree, he
> > > > > is pretty satiated.
> > > >
> > > > You mean he has *mood* *swings* ????
> > > >
> > > > I'm shocked :-)
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > Peter isn't around much. IOW, there's nothing 'psych' left in
> > > > > > spp that I enjoy in between kooks because there are no psychs
> > > > > > left. It's just one big parade of kooks and trolls and a few
> > > > > > friendly kook enthusiasts and other friends I can stay in touch
> > > > > > by other means.
> > > > >
> > > > > And who brought them to SPP by cross posting to AUK HMMMMMMM?
> > > >
> > > > You can tell that because if you only post to this newsgroup they never
> > > > see
> > > > what
> > > > you say.
> > > >
> > > > > > Anyway, I'm busy. So, I'm going to be taking a nice, long break
> > > > > > from Usenet. You're gonna miss me, I know, but I have no doubt
> > > > > > that soon you'll find someone else to threaten; you've been
> > > > > > doing it to anyone who sees you for what you are since long
> > > > > > before you came into spp.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well have a good time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > File that APA complaint if you feel you must, Lynne, but first
> > > > > > run the whole thing by an attorney, because you should be aware
> > > > > > of the consequences of filing a malicious false complaint of
> > > > > > this nature. Let's just say I won't give you the same tyrant's
> > > > > > leeway that your other victims have.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Since you are leaving, I have some words of advise. "Do unto others
> > > > > as
> > > > > you would have them do unto you".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > <cue kook celebration and the giddy spank claims of terminally
> > > > > > clueless> lol
> > > > >
> > > > > I also saw where you told Body Snatcher that you were going to a
> > > > > conference and would return to watch and giggle from the sidelines.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for not actively posting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Adieux.
> > > > > hoof
> > > >
> > > > This must mean we have finally cleaned up this newsgroup. Which one
> > > > should
> > > > we
> > > > start on next, do you think?
> > >
> > > I was thinking about that last night coincidentally.
> > > I had one in mind, but since I haven't fully awaken this AM, I can't
> > > remember which one is in dire need of the 3 caballeros services.
> > > hoof
> >
> > Maybe the Professor will have some ideas? I've been handling the the New
> > Labour
> > Newsgroup all on my own. I assure you that nobody will vote for Blair ever
> > again. Another Aussie helps me out in the geology and earthquake groups.
>
> International Law isn't my thing, sorry.
>
> >
> > I've got soc.rights.human
>
> hmmm!! What is their problem?
>
> >and alt.journalism sown up with some help.
>
> This one may be of interest, I do have an A in a lower division
> Journalism class.
>
> >
> > alt.religion.goddess
>
>
> I am avoiding religious groups. Based on wild posts from my Talk
> Abortion days by Fundies.
>
> >is benefiting from my input, and I just started work on
> > uk.philosophy.humanism
>
> I don't think so, Pom. I have made a few posts to philo groups who were
> talking about vegetarian rights etc.
> The Blue Label and all that rot.
> hoof

We could always just stay here and discuss roses; mine are still in full bloom.
You know how much that upsets everybody :-)

LOL



Lord Cerne Abbas

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/identity.html

http://lordcerneabbastoo.blogspot.com/

http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/

http://www.fqms.org/member/list/index.asp
.

Relevant Pages
Loading