Re: Brad, hate to burst your bubble re file creation date....

Your failure to address the "last saved" issue
(the main issue re: the second letter -- for which you
have the source code; and, the issue I have told all about), just
shows you are trying to lie and mislead,

JUST LIKE YOU TOLD PURE COMPLETE BASELESS LIES ABOUT
Viruses, malware, trojans, etc. in my open-source programs.

YOU ARE A PROVEN MALICIOUS LIAR, Iceman.

Iceman <1c3m4n@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:df631e$abk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> Well, actually I do. ;)
>
> I took the zip file you so kindly put up and extracted the doc from
> it.
>
> Guess what? LOL
>
> Teh original date/time remained the same
> Teh print date/time remained the same
> The creation date and access date and time was the actual time I
> extracted the doc from your source file.
>
> {POP} there goes your precious little bubble.
> and yes, this is not the info on the general tab either.
>
> Now as to the mattur of the Ver. 1???
>
> By now most peeps should know the doc has virtually no protection.
> There is no Pword, nada, simply click unprotect and you have full
> access to the poorly configured doc. Whoever wrote that template
> should be shot, and whoever emails something like that from a state
> office ought to be fired!
>
> That doc is virtually worthless to anyone other than the original
> recipient as there is inadequate protection and anyone can modify it,
> eh Braddie boi?
>
> Yes, I get contracts and proposals, in a word doc, all are protected,
> IOW cannot be modified for rather obvious reasons, get it Brad? Not
> yet you say? Well it seems that business does not want idiots like you
> to mess with their proposals or contracts and get them in deep
> financial doo doo.
>
> Therefore your *cough* proof t'aint wurth a chit. It is as worthless
> as your promise to pay up on your "offers".
>
> Anyone can make a doc of their own choosing, using the graphic with
> his sig (which was probably lifted anyhow) and if someone makes one,
> ie; you and it gets printed or properly secured and sent to a news org
> then someone may get in deep chit over it, including the "insider" in
> his office.
>
> Bottom line?
>
> Even if it weren't a frog, it t'aint wurth chit. At this point if you
> had them print out a copy, notarize it and send it registered mail no
> one in their right mind would accept it.
>
> Your little dance is over, you lost, your wurd is now more suspect
> than before. Deal with it.
>
> Oh, and when you talk to the cops and had them a printout of that
> *cough* doc do be sure and let them know it is wurthless.
>
> BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Running .Net 2.0 Application without having .Net Framework installed
    ... I will get the source code for you. ... You don't need to compile it to native code for that. ... think the best protection, that's nonsense. ... Decompiling native code doesn't differ much from decompiling IL code. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Running .Net 2.0 Application without having .Net Framework installed
    ... assemblies. ... I will get the source code for you. ... may be good for native code. ... think the best protection, that's nonsense. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: GNU License Question, On Change of Code
    ... >> implications on attempts to get patent protection. ... no restrictions on distribution of the source code. ... something public if not by publishing it on the front page of the New York ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)
  • Re: Email clients
    ... > best protection against such things as system borks like that but it's ... Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence. ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.advocacy)
  • Re: Whats so great about lisp?
    ... >You continually make languages like C++ and Java appear to have features ... In C++ you can cast away any protection the ... >module that checks the source code before it is compiled. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
Loading