Re: Brads *cough* 2nd doc
- From: NayNay <NayNay@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 17:13:51 +0200
Indeed, Peter Hood's "conclusive evidence" is ACTUALLY SIMPLY
purely and clearly BOGUS:
Again, in another thread:
darb <35jolarb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:4315c599_3@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
> When you click on the properties of the original O'Malley letter
> and click advanced, you see the creation date: 8/29/05 1:06 p.m.
>
> When you click on the properties of the 2nd (new) O'Malley letter
> and click advanced, you see the creation date: 8/29/05 1:06 p.m. --
> affirming my statement that the second is simply a modified version
> of the first
>
> This one also shows THE LAST SAVED DATE AND TIME OF:
> 8/30/05 11:45 a.m.
>
> THIS TIME FOLLOWS THE TIME OF THE REQUEST OF BY ME, of a new
> clarified letter (a request I made Monday, August 29, 2005 9:58 PM )
>
> ALL THE "PROBLEMS" 'Iceman' and Peter Hood Pretend are there are NOT!!
>
[snip]
darb <35jolarb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:4315b68e_1@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Not only NOT conclusive but what is pointed out makes
> it almost certain the document is valid:
>
> The explanation is VERY SIMPLE: The second document from Assist.
> Super. O'Malley was created BY MODIFYING THE FIRST DOC HE SENT.
>
> Thus, the "created" date preceeds my request to clarify the document,
> because my request for the clarification FOLLOWED THE CREATION of
> the original document (that is, the first document) -- which was
> modified to create the second document!!.
>
> Peter the Penis Farmer <peter_hood@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:gtmah19lsf2ihlri6g1rrq7c5507935op7@xxxxxxx:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:56:01 -0400, in
>> sci.psychology.psychotherapy Iceman <1c3m4n@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> quoth:
>>
>>>Notice date and time message sent from Brad.....
>>>
>>>Then notice date and time the 3rd version of the doc was created
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [my email snipped]
>>>Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:58 PM
>>>To: Bca.Info@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: attn: Assist. Siper. O'Malley: Re: From Assistant =
>>>Superintendent Tim O'Malley.
>>>--------------------------
>>>
>>>Brad Jesness.doc
>>>Created: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:06:00 PM
>>>Print: Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:19:00 PM
>>>
>>>Evidently the doc was modified about 8 Hrs before he requested it.
>>>Nuff said?
>>>
>>>Oh, and Brad do you really want to see the 1st version of this?
>>
>>
>> Conclusive proof that Brad lied. So, between three of us we
>> proved he lies and Body Snatcher <that'll be you, right?>
>> found an email address that he wanted to remain hidden.
>>
>> Good bye Bradnee sweet. Parting is such sweet sorrow, isn't
>> it?
>>
>> HAVSD.
>
>
.
- References:
- Re: Brads *cough* 2nd doc
- From: darb
- Re: Brads *cough* 2nd doc
- Prev by Date: Re: Brads *cough* 2nd doc
- Next by Date: Re: More evidence of the "Date Created"
- Previous by thread: Re: Brads *cough* 2nd doc
- Next by thread: Re: Brads *cough* 2nd doc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading