Re: Clear Proof of Harassment and Libelous Malice

Dan Rogers:

You are simply just supporting an anonymous malicious stalker and
spammer and malicious lying defamer (under the law -- similar to
yourself) . wilhelp.com is an anonymous abuse domain via
domainsbyproxy.com and run by a guy going by a TRUE alias.
THERE IS NO "TAYLOR JIMENEZ"! This creep is defaming me several
places I have never even been, proving him to be a criminal-type, who
engages in illegal harassment and stalking defamation.

All reasonable people can see this. There is no "Taylor Jimenez". He
has been outed by me as Joe Jared and is a super creep, according to
several who have been abused and spammed and tortured by him.

-- Brad Jesness

**** I am x-privat.org X-Authenticated-User: $$f6xz9vbosvjdod7n$mxc ****
see http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/mypubKey2.htm for verification.


"Card XII" <dlrodgers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:EfyGe.3031$j21.2787@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

>
> "darb" <35jolarb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42ea321d$1_3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Dan Rogers and other psychopathic individuals occassionally continue
>> to pretend that
>> their "harshness" (to put it VERY mildly) is just a response to the
>> WAY I post and not my content. BUT there is NO evidence of this:
>> There is not one bit of evidence of inappropriate behavior by me
>> (in any sense) for many years (and really NO evidence of any
>> inappropriate behavior (in most reasonable persons' minds) AND
>> certainly never ANY serious inappropriate behavior OR any
>> behavior ever coming near the level of that used against me..
>
> I love to have facts presented that are contrary to my knowledge.
> That's how I learn. I'm a scientist, so I like disconfirming
> evidence.
>
> You, little jackass, are totally unable to stand any disagreement.
> You who have never done a lick of science, who never received grad
> training in psychotherapy, who has lied about having faculty
> positions, publications, etc., you won't tolerate any disagreement
> with your scientology positions.
>
>> Not only is there NO evidence for their position whatsoever, but
>> there are a growing number of examples of posting of malicious
>> libelous material
>> against me to MANY, MANY forums where I have NEVER, EVER
>> participated.
>
> There is a whole CD of it. There are the archives. There are the
> brad faqs:
>
> http://www.wilhelp.com/bj_faq
>
> for one. Plenty of others, right brad? And it is gospel truth. All
> archived.
>
> Makes you look like a liar, the sort who would park down the street
> and watch enviously, eh?
>
> I'm so sorry to disappoint you, brad, because you have had nothing but
> disappointments in life. But there is a wonderful CD with all your
> posts from even way, way back. And there are the archives. Wonderful
> things, archives, don't you think?
>
> They show that everybody, one after another, tried to be nice to you.
> Including me. Just like everybody else you call a liar, I believed
> you wanted to actually discuss things. So I gently suggested a few
> readings for you, since you seemed to be familiar only with some
> really, really old literature. It was obvious that you were not a
> psychologist, though you said that you were. I did a quick web search
> back then, and contacted some friends at U of Iowa, and I learned your
> unfortunate and sad history.
>
> But I remained friendly.
>
> You, however, went beserko because I disagreed with you. Just as you
> had done with everybody else. You sent vulgar emails to me knowing my
> children would check my email. You threatened me. You tried to
> harass me.
>
> New grad students came on and you wrote, phoned, and emailed their
> faculty. You were already harassing disabled people and depressed
> people on newsgroups.
>
> Simply put, brad, you are a liar and a failure. Your marriage is a
> failure, you have never had a real job (White Castle doesn't count),
> you park down the street, you have claimed to be a professor, a
> psychologist, an internationally known scholar, and so on.
>
> But you are, alas, just a loser.
>
> Everybody here knows it. You have deluded yourself into believing
> your own posts and suckpuppets and your claims to have legions of
> supports.
>
> But you are just a loser.
>
> You forged posts from the president of Amer. Psychological
> Association. You forged posts from me. You complained to licensing
> boards. And so on. All without any success.
>
> You are just a loser.
>
> You'll go away eventually. Probably somebody will kick your ass
> first. You are pretty stupid and don't seem to be able to comprehend
> that the rivers are rising.
>
> In another 10 years, nobody will remember you. Not on usenet,
> nowhere. You have wasted your life trying to prove you are important,
> without ever doing anything of accomplishment. Totally wasted it.
> Even Giarmo is surpassing you.
> Kids are surpassing you.
>
> You are sad. But you are also malicious and self-centered, so I won't
> give you a break. Nobody else is, either, are they?
>
> You go, little kook!
>
> Card XII
> Hammer of Thor, May 2005
> Order of the detrevnI Buckyball
>
>
>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Clear Proof of Harassment and Libelous Malice
    ... BUT there is NO evidence of this: ... psychotherapy, who has lied about having faculty positions, publications, ... Plenty of others, right brad? ... posts and suckpuppets and your claims to have legions of supports. ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy)
  • Re: Santa Bill McReynolds
    ... There are so many posts going back ... The movie deal was brought up by ... Ramseys watched any of those movies, let's see some evidence that ... Ramsey was a Promise Keepers member? ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • Re: Sock Puppet Fun Revisited [was Re: McCall - no guts, no glory; put up or shutup
    ... your posts to know the way this goes. ... The Burden of Proof Principle ... When people ask "what do you mean by compelling evidence?" ... The Acceptability Principle ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
  • Re: My journey through RMB archives
    ... "Yoko tried to murder John" nonsense. ... side and the anti-Yoko (Seaman) side. ... skepticism that he expressed elsewhere in his posts. ... no evidence for any of it whatsoever. ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: SPP Stalkers still gangstalking OP after a decade.
    ... accusations made against me, Brad Jesness. ... Here's raw evidence she was deemed an out and out Spammer ... responding positively to SPP stalkers demands that people repost the ... LP had spammed usenet with posts to globally smear and defame Brad. ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy)