"What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
- From: "Xedni" <xndni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:21:15 -0500
"What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
The basic tenet of both Special and General Relativity is that the laws
and constants of the Science of Physics are the same within all velocity
and/or elevation reference frames. When correctly interpreted, it means
that, when these laws and/or constants are measured WITHIN a given velocity
and/or elevation reference frame, they have the same NUMERICAL value as when
a corresponding measurement is made WITHIN another velocity and/or elevation
reference frame. It does not imply that, when they have the same ABSOLUTE
value in all reference frames, it means that a change in reference frame
produces a change in the ABSOLUTE SIZE of the measuring device(s) used to
make the observation. This change(s) serve to conceal any changes in the
ABSOLUTE VALUE, That is what relativity theory is all about! Once that fact
is understood, with a little bit of insight, relativistic effects become
intuitively obvious. (For easily understood illustration of this type of
effect, consider a hypothetical measurement of the price of gasoline in
Windsor, Ontario Canada and ten miles away in Detroit Michigan USA. Consider
next that gasoline was found to be $3.00/gallon at both locations. Gasoline
would then be invariant between the two locations in the same sense that
physical laws an constants are invariant between elevations or velocity
reference frames. However, in Canada gasoline is measured in terms of the
Imperial gallon and in the USA gasoline is with the US gallon which is 20%
smaller.. As a result, in the same terms as defined by physicists for their
measurements, is a "constant" within the reference frames of Windsor and
Detroit, but it is not CONSTANT in the terms that we use for rational
The premise of Relativity Theory that the velocity of light is the same
in all reference frames is backwards. What Relativity Theory tells us is
that MATTER USES THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT TO CONTROL ITS PROPERTIES, The
absolute length of a yardstick and the duration of the ticks of a clock DO
CHANGE as a function of velocity and/or elevation in a manner which makes
all LOCAL observations yield the same observed physical laws. In the case of
velocity, the effect is easily illustrated by considering the case of a
fleet of boats traveling though water and using SONAR to maintain their
relative positions. , (See HTTP://einsteinhoax.com/cf63) If time were also
measured by a sonar clock, a behavior analogous to the behavior described
under Special Relativity would occur. One need only to add the fact that the
permeability of space is decreased by the proximity of energy, as
represented by an attracting object in the gravitational field, to provide a
complete description of the gravitational field. Special and General
Relativity after the fundamental error in General Relativity is corrected,
provide a complete intuitively obvious description of our overall Universe.
Unfortunately General Relativity the derivation of General Relativity
involved an error of a type which would cause a course failure if
persistently made by an undergraduate student of integral calculus. The
effect of this error is readily identifiable by comparing the Lorentz
Transformations of Special Relativity with the force, length and time
dilations provided by General Relativity. One does not have to be overly
bright to recognize that something is wrong, either with one or both of
these theories. The error is in General Relativity and it prevented Dr.
Einstein from solving his gravity equations for 18 months until he resorted
to the fakery of "curved space" to provide an otherwise unnecessary degree
of freedom. General Relativity was accepted as proven as a results made of a
total eclipse in 1919. Overlooked was the fact that the Sun's gravitational
field was at least 1000 times too weak to properly verify the theory. The
error in General Relativity introduced an artificial conflict between
gravitational theory and Quantum Mechanics.
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einsteinhoax2@xxxxxxxxxxxx If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
- Prev by Date: (OT) Understanding million, billion, trillion.....
- Next by Date: R. T. Cahill's Quantum Foam Theory
- Previous by thread: (OT) Understanding million, billion, trillion.....
- Next by thread: R. T. Cahill's Quantum Foam Theory