"The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
- From: "Rediug" <rediug@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:27:08 -0500
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
When it comes to particle physics a question arises. High Energy
experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived high-energy products. As
an example, a proton and an anti-proton, each having a mass equivalent
energy of 1 GEV are accelerated to a velocity so close to that of light so
that they each contain kinetic energy of hundreds of GEV. These particles
are then induced to collide and, in so doing, produce short lived
high-energy products having observable mass equivalent energies of hundreds
of GEV. Where did the energy they represent come from?
A:- The energy certainly wasn't in the original particles, their rest
mass indicates that their total energy was about 2 GEV.
B:- The only source of the excess energy represented by the collision
products is the kinetic energy of the impacting protons. The observed total
energy after the collision never seems to be reported as exceeding the input
energy. If the excess energy was hidden in the original protons and did not
come from their kinetic energy, then where did the kinetic energy go?
C:- Experiment indicates that electrons, and the quarks that make up
protons and neutrons have no solid structure down to the observation limit
of 10^-18 meters, as indeed they cannot have. The more rest mass energy a
particle has, the smaller it is. If quarks contained smaller particles, the
rest mass of those smaller particles would be greater than the rest mass of
the quark and the proton or neutron would be more massive than it is. On the
other hand, if particles making up the quark were less massive than the
quark they would also be larger and would not fit within the nucleon.
Rather than accept the fact that these particles contain no structure,
theoreticians have resorted to Superstring Theory that asserts that reality
consists of curled higher order dimensions having a radius 20 orders of
magnitude smaller than the nucleon (a nice choice of scale since their
observation is not likely to ever be possible). At this scale level, the
combination of Quantum Theory and General Relativity is asserted to cause
space to be a frothy foam. Unfortunately physicists would rather accept such
a concept than accept the idea that there is an error in General Relativity,
after all the quasi-religious "Faith" must not be challenged. Once the error
is admitted and the necessary corrections made, the merging of the two
theories becomes obvious. The need for the activity at 10^-34 meters
vanishes and space becomes smooth.
Everything really does become much simpler when one follows the rules
of evidence in Science as well it is done in other activities and recognize
that it is necessary to consider the effects of possible changes in the size
of the units of measurement used by instruments produced by a change in
reference frame in addition to the results of those measurements. When one
takes this step an entirely different view of reality results. This view of
reality is much more straightforward and is capable of being understood by
the average man since the operation of its mechanisms are clear.
The disturbing part of the present process is that the next generation
of scientists is having their minds destroyed by being indoctrinated into
the "True Faith".
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einsteinhoax2@xxxxxxxxxxxx If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
- Prev by Date: Re: 50 Watt Thermonuclear Fusion?
- Next by Date: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
- Previous by thread: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
- Next by thread: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"