Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- From: "Mr. Hat" <hat-san@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:14:16 GMT
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@xxxxxxx> wrote...
< The difference is that controlled fusion can power a city while uncontrolled fusion
< can vaporize it.
That's a POLITICAL difference, not a scientific one.
No, it is very scientific because it is very easy to create an uncontrolled fusion reaction, but after a half-century of research they are still unable to create a sustainable controlled fusion reaction. I don't see how it is any more "political" than the way science controls gasoline combustion to power our vehicles instead of allowing an uncontrolled explosion that would set you and the car on fire.
Here's a quote related to science and politics I hope you'll like:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ "In Oceania at the present day, Science, in the old sense, has almost ceased to exist. In Newspeak there is no word for 'Science.' The empirical method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc. And even technological progress only happens when its products can in some way be used for the diminution of human liberty. In all the useful arts the world is either standing still or going backwards. The fields are cultivated with horse plows while books are written by machinery. But in matters of vital importance - meaning, in effect, war and police espionage - the empirical approach is still encouraged, or at least tolerated. The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought. There are therefore two great problems which the Party is concerned to solve. One is how to discover, against his will, what another human being is thinking, and the other is how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand. In so far as scientific research still continues, this is its subject matter." -- 1984 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- From: Bret Cahill
- Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- References:
- "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- From: Bret Cahill
- Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- From: Mr. Garrison
- Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- From: Bret Cahill
- "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- Prev by Date: Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- Next by Date: Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- Previous by thread: Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- Next by thread: Re: "Fissionless Fusion" Instead of Emotional Value Laden Terms
- Index(es):