Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!

I believe you Boronandonandon Hubristica,

But I think I'm the only one listening to you. Finally, you have posted something believable in theory instead of just posting how isotopes migrate in the tungsten filaments of light bulbs. (I guess you were trying to be subtle in how the "strong force" radiates spatially expansive "particles" that fuel the expansion of the parts of our Universe that we currently understand in a "sort of" and "hand waving" kind of way.. Have you seen equations? Can you send me some in Maple format?

Six months ago - I thought I was about to break the Prime Function.. But it gets really tricky when the intervals become nearly infinite. I would hate to think that even things as simple as positive integer counting numbers break down near some parts of infinity.. But it looks like they do.

I think what we are taling about is 'connective string theory' = and this is derived from the Quark interaction dynamic - as it stands and is measured currently in posted literature?

Thanks,

Ricxk



Fusioneer wrote: 
On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue.  Basically the
argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the
galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter.  For
example, if you were far enough from our own solar system, you would
only be able to see the sun, yet by analyzing the movements of the
solar system, it would be evident that there is a lot more mass than
just the sun.  I don't understand why this is such a big deal, off
course there is more mass than just the sun, lots more!  We got lots of
planets, asteroid belts, meteors, etc.  It doesn't seem worthy of such
deep analysis as I'm seeing on the scientific community.  When we're
talking about a galaxy such as ours, I'm sure there is plenty of
non-luminous stuff out there, 5-10 times more non-luminous than
luminous matter sounds reasonable.  Furthermore, I don't think we'll
have the technology to account for every stellar object in our galaxy
for hundreds of years.  When we're talking about the universe as a
whole, I think it would be pretty darn silly for us to suspect we can
see it all from our puny telescopes.  I don't think we'll be able to
map the whole universe for thousands of years.

Is there anyone who can explain in plain terms why is it more
complicated than what I just explained?



Well, let me spell it out.   Dark matter is dark because it cannot
allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons.  No
one knew this until I discovered it but a gravitational field will
produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons
from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star.  Oh, and
I discovered that the essence of a gravitational field is a charge and
its conjugate in superposition structured in a vector field like a Del
X H or Del X E.  The terminus of the gravitational field that
originates from such a large scale standing wave boson is along the
toroidal axis of that flux toroid.  A side issue is that photons are
gravitational charge units.  Who knew? LOL.  I did.   Photons can be
forced to disassociate into a charge and its conjugate...electron and
positron.   The gravitational field of a photon is precisely what gives
the photon the ability to ionize matter...because of the charge
separation mechanism.  This really isn't all that difficult folks...
A gravitational field is a time rate gradient field... Think about it.
 Particles that approach the terminus of a gravitational field (the
terminus is a loop not a point and it is the closed line at which the
time is most strongly dilated) will immediately begin to overlap in
momentum space because they develop a common de Broglie wavelength that
is equal to or greater than their interparticle distance --- why?
Because with respect to any outside observer their relative speed with
respect to each other begins to approach 0.  And lambda = h/mv so as
v->0 then lambda -> large values and the begin to overlap in  momentum
space.  It is really trivial to show that elementary charges which are
overlapping in the same momentum space will behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law... That's right folks...there is no
strong force...what we've been calling the strong force is really
entirely electromagnetic in nature and it is so damn easy to show that
this is true that I'm just amazed that so many bright people never
figured this out.  No strong force... No gluons, no quarks... Amazing
that so many people are so easily taken in by the results of inductive
logic which cannot yield certainties.

So, that matter...which I have called Isaacium is just pure neutrons
and protons...entirely baryonic.  I named it Isaacium because Isaac in
Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief and I figured that most astro
guys and cosmologists will laugh in disbelief at the suggestion that
I've actually managed to unify electromagnetism and gravity and could
deduce the existence of this baryonic matter because I discovered that
a gravitation field will produce a strong charge separation
effect...something no one else has suggested.  It is heavy precisely
because electrons are excluded and so it doesn't possess atomic volume
(which are related to the presence of electrons).  It is dark for the
same reason... No electron associations.   And you can see that it
occurs in rings...loops that are coincident to the toroidal axis of the
standing wave boson that is the primary physical feature of a star.
So, if the boson is displaced or expands more rapidly than the Isaacium
ring can accommodate to it then a supernova results as a cascade of
electrons flows down to the Isaacium and is acquired by it.  The result
is that the Isaacium begins to differentiate into a wide variety of
atomic species... There is an immense radiation flux that will emerge
because of all those electrons falling down to ground states and an
immense explosion as the Isaacium makes the transition from having only
nuclear volume to acquiring atomic volume as it differentiates into
ordinary elements.   I was hoping people would get a clue as to why the
primary signature of a recent supernova is an expanding ring of matter.
 How do you get an expanding ring except that you start with a ring?
People should pay more attention to the clues that the universe gives
us.

How's this relate to fusion?.. get a clue people... I'm becoming
embarassed for you all.   Does everything have to be spelled out for
you?  Fusion occurs only when fusion fuel nuclei are overlapping in
momentum space.

My stabilized standing wave boson reactor system design, called the
SKYBOLT(tm) reactor, is the only way to build a functioning safe
nuclear reactor system.

C. Cagle

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
    ... I'm still waiting on the constrctive to toroid volume answer to several of my questions to you. ... allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. ... produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons ... from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. ...
    (sci.physics.fusion)
  • Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
    ... argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter. ... allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. ... produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons ... from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. ...
    (sci.physics.fusion)
  • Re: Extension of the Equivalence Principle to include the EM Field
    ... that wrt the perspective of the point charge itself, ... to the developement of this fictious gravitational field. ... field acts on all things to which a relative position in space can be ... It is not so clear the earth acts predictably on electrons ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
    ... > I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue. ... allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. ... produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons ... from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. ...
    (sci.physics.fusion)
  • Re: The electron shell model is in challenge
    ... > the assumption that the charge of a nucleus with Z protons is Z*e. ... >> and not the stupid electrons around it. ... > That's a completely unsupported assertion. ... only God can help you (physics teacher) ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
Loading