Re: Dogma and New or Different EM Concepts

On Sep 14, 9:18 pm, "FrediFizzx" <fredifi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

All fine except that experiments also get more and more expensive to do
as our knowledge becomes more refined.  So it is not so easy as you
think it is.  Did you have any luck setting up that div E = rho
experiment yet without using matter?  ;-)

Listen to this typical establishment crap. Oh, physics can only be
done with huge billion dollar wanking machines. Those aren't science
Fizzle, those are make-work scams designed to throw everyone OFF the
track of real physics. One of the genius physicists that I once worked
for told me he could keep undergraduates busy for a semester doing
cutting edge physics with nothing but a pendulum and a stop watch. I
believe him because I've seen him do that sort of thing many times.
The difference between you and him was he knew that science takes
place in the MIND not in tax-payer funded lab.

Fizzle every time you open your mouth you just show more ignorance. A
graduate of "physics appreciation" I take it?
You have NO idea what an electron is. You have NO idea what an
electric field is. You have NO idea what creates the force between
charges in an electric field. You have NO idea what a charge is. In
short you might as well switch to cosmology or high school science
teaching where nobody else has a clue about anything so you feel at
home and don't have to worry about embarrassing yourself. The fact is
(though I sure am not going to be able to convince you of any of this
advanced thought) that an electron has no mass. In fact it is LESS
than nothing at all. It is a true vortex in aether. Hence ANY electron
tube easily produces an E with zero mass. I suggest one of those multi-
billion dollar "magic eye" tubes for your cutting edge experiments.
You somehow got the idea that you are so clever but truth is: You are
an idiot.

[snip the usual Benj rants]

Anyone that wants to learn can teach their self.  Humans do have that
capability. Teach, learn or get out of the way...

Oh sure, You'd love to get that fake credit for how "wonderful" and
"dedicated" all "educators" are. Feh. I'm sorry, buster, but I've had
a lot of experience with the American education system and it's pure
shit. And the people who aren't fired from it are all dumb as a box of
hammers when it comes to science. I presume that includes you.

My favorite bumper sticker: If you can't read this, thank a teacher!

Fizzle, if you truly were concerned about science education instead of
some union salary, first, you acknowledge that everything I'm saying
is absolutely true instead of dismissing it out of hand as a "usual
rant". And Second, you'd try to DO something to fix the problems
instead of defending the stooopid status quo that you all have built
for yourselves. AT least I'm making some noise about the problems. Tis
YOU who needs to "get out of the way", Bubba!

For more information on your mental capabilities I refer to you
Andro...



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: We are, a mass extinction event.
    ... Yet another where we ar at, available in audio book form wherever you ... This would be colse to accepted text book science and with modern ... And the physics in it, ... An electron which is everywhere at the same time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: physical laws and the universe
    ... >The subject was you thinking that science can answer the "why". ... That's one of the favorite answers of the perpetually clueless ... Physics ... Answer: because each electron ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
    ... Maybe, but science is empirical. ... brought it into physics. ... At the interaction of the electron with the vacuum, ... The physicists make measuring not understanding ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is physics a science?
    ... science and technology. ... It is whatever physics wants it to be. ... >>>aether would do, as long as it has certain basic properties, and test ... >> physicists to explain it to them. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]
    ... > That may be true for your science, and for some possibly Post Modernist ... of physics are like that eg the law of conservation of energy is no more ... should not be used - its context is not well defined. ... >> training but not of the type used in philosophy which is along the lines ...
    (sci.physics)