Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Benj <bjacoby@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 22, 5:28 am, pmb <pm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not "all" of them, just "most" of them! :-)
That makes you a crackpot by definition. I don't correspond with
crackpots in newsgroups.
In case you didn't notice, Pete, nobody requested your establishment
opinion here. I'm sure I can manage just fine without your sermons
extolling the wonders of faith-based physics dogma.
And anyway, unlike you, I'm a crackpot by choice!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: pmb
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- References:
- rotating magnetic field
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Benj
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: pmb
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Benj
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: pmb
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Benj
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: pmb
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Benj
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: pmb
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: Benj
- Re: rotating magnetic field
- From: pmb
- rotating magnetic field
- Prev by Date: Re: rotating magnetic field
- Next by Date: Re: rotating magnetic field
- Previous by thread: Re: rotating magnetic field
- Next by thread: Re: rotating magnetic field
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|