Re: is the magnetic field really moving?


<phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g8qarl3dag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:00:51 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr
<terrylhewettsr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| <phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:g8nbas2irp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:42:37 -0500
|>
|> Are you saying this technology makes energy from nothing?
|
| Not what I'm saying at all. However i am saying that this technology
uses
| well known and currently applied mechanical interractions to a new
mechanism
| that has the potential to transform energy in a cyclic manner for a very
| long time with little or no losses.

Is there an input of energy in some form? What form?

No input or output. it is a closed system. There is only induction into the
system. in short the electrical aperatus you are powering is induced into
the system and becomes a part of the closed system. Maintaining system
integrity.

With that said and should be understood that is under normal operating
conditions. There is a inital startup that would have to be from an outside
source.



I'm assuming the output of energy is electrical (a useful form), or one
that
could easily be converted to electrical. If you can produce 100 watts of
power continuously, how many joules per seconds of energy input is this
device getting?


Again no input or output.



| You will NEVER remove the storage mechanism from any mechanism man made
or
| occuring naturally. In the case of the SRTT it is flywheel energy as a
| storage mechanism. in fact the polar arrangement of the multipole toroid
| armature and the multipole belt are a looped dipole arrangement. the
SRTT
| uses this arrangement for storage. The unnamed invention i refer to as a
| mechanical trinket doesn't use this dipole arrangement for storage. It
does
| use a battery bank wired in such a manner that the battery bank is
| essentially a low pass filter.

So the output is not smooth DC. What is it? Pulsed DC? AC?

If i were to put each internal componanent of the system in terms of input
and output both input and output are a consistant with DC.




| I wouldn't suggest that just anyone build the SRTT as i have built
prototype
| #6 (multipart). It is designed as a ONE PIECE toroid armature. The
multipart
| construction is the equivilent of a unique fragmentation device. You
DON"T
| have my permission to toy with this technology in any other capacity
than to
| contemplate it's workings. However if you take it upon yourself to
actually
| build a prototype of the SRTT i cannot be held responsible for loss of
life
| or limb.

Lack of permission from you means nothing unless there is a patent. I can
accept your lack of legal liability. If I come to know how to build this
device, I believe I could determine its risk.

Prepairing for the multitude of potential risks is more my worry. proper
facilities are a must.
When things go wrong they go horribly wrong post haste. think for a minute
were toying with a frictionless mechanism that has the potential to meet or
exceed any frequency of change we are aware of and probably many we don't
know of or have benchmarked per say. Design variations may bring us to this
point but for now it is not designed to approach a harmful range.





| If you want to experiment with the following technology feel free to.
Just
| don't forget who you got it from, I want proper noteriety and a copy of
your
| works. It would be in err to assume that your going to manufacture
without
| my express knowledge and cooperation. I feel it is safer at this point
as a
| multipart construction.
| http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!mechtrinket2.jpg

You have a patent, or have applied for one?

Why do you put ! characters in URLs or file names? Strange.

Not so strange. just a personal thing i do on occation. when considering the
thousands of images one creates or use on websites it is simpler than coding
or decoding something like this 7r90t21j65.jpg on a consistant basis when
editing websites. It is also an indicator that the person viewing the
spacific range of images is a person of interest through website statistics.

I sent out hundreds of emails with the images and text pertaining to this
and other technology of mine. it is a way of seeing if they actually viewed
the images or just discarded the email.



| I am currently building prototype #1. it will likely have a hand crank
| instead of a low volt dc motor and controller. the multipart belt is a
pain
| trying to get the rubber spacers precisely cut uniformly. i have made a
jig
| for this however 1 in 10 passes my quality control.
|
| I cannot stress enough that my inventions are *multifarious* in a
multitude
| of ways. Scale is a primary consideration. small is good in this
particular
| mechanism for it's potential application. Allthough this mechanism is
using
| the same multipole configuration as the SRTT it is not dependent on
rigid
| spinning mass to drive the multiple flux fields through the induction
coils
| cyclic.

Maybe you can explain what it really does.

In short sustain the dipole of the storage mechanism.



|> Then construct it in isolation that prevents
|> access to any other material or parts (if you want to hide from me how
it
|> is
|> built).
|
| I'm not bieng carr here in any way. it should be pretty apparent what
| materials and parts are used.

Huh? I can't figure out much from the web site and photos and drawings.

For example, for all magnets, you should show the field orientation of the
magnets in a drawing, or added to a photo.


Ok i need a key on some images and my communication skills are fairly
minimal. It would be much easier if i was of academia or if i could express
it in mathematical terms. However that is not the case. I'm a unaccredited
benchtop inventor who's invention has drawn me into the very heart of
natural physics. Seemingly challenging science physics on several levels.
That's not to say that my own understanding hasn't been challenged over the
course of a decade or two.


|> Then show me how much power it produces, and lets run it for a month
|> and see how much energy it can produce.
|>
|
| Untill i can implement design spacific componants or computer modeling
the
| SRTT is at a stand still in research and developement.

Let me know when it works. Be sure to patent it.

--
I allready told you it works. What's more important, that mankind understand
the very basis of natural physics, or terry selfishly worry about lining his
pockets with cash? However don't assume i havn't took measures to protect my
interests.

In all realities i never had money, i don't have money and it is likely i
will never have money.
I will probably die two weeks before my technology is realized. Adding my
name to the list of dead inventors that never lived to see their greatness.
Effectively robbing mankind of the oppertunity of any real understanding of
the concept through the inventors eyes. Why should i be any different? hell
einstien gave several lectures on e=mc2 and it still isn't fully understood.
there are volumes of text on gravity and we as a commonwealth of knowledge
still don't have a clue.

The truth is that natural physics closely guards it's secrets by non
disclosure. If we want to know those secrets we have to discover them. In
many cases we have discovered some key bits of information and academia has
did a wonderful job of catagorizing them into seporate fields of study. That
is a err natural physics would be better understood if academia recognized
that natural physics encompasses everything in the universe and each is
relevant to each other equally.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: is the magnetic field really moving?
    ... |> |> Are you saying this technology makes energy from nothing? ... However i am saying that this technology ... If there is no output of electricity, what good is it for me? ... | the very basis of natural physics, or terry selfishly worry about lining ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: is the magnetic field really moving?
    ... However i am saying that this technology ... |> | that has the potential to transform energy in a cyclic manner for a very ... If there is no output of electricity, what good is it for me? ... | the very basis of natural physics, or terry selfishly worry about lining his ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: Masking the Subversion of FTL Technology with Ivory Tower Accreditation
    ... the use of free energy by sidetracking the real version ... but "limited" energy to the taxpayer. ... technology by rewarding institutions with grants who ... chromodynamic gauge transformation during gravitational ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • why space opera wont fly (long)
    ... compress cosmic scales of time, space, and energy to make them ... any technology for FTL is also ... devices that turn heat into mechanical work. ... If we're limited to speeds much less than the speed of light, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Electrogravitics is Reality!
    ... into account the stress energy tensor is "ludicrous", ... of "fuelless" technology. ... A "quantum energized" economy should produce so much material wealth ... The oil problem is dominated by the corporations that have an enormous ...
    (sci.space.policy)