Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Jul 2008 02:44:15 GMT
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:22:49 +0200 "Szczepan Bia?ek" <sz.bialek@xxxxx> wrote:
|
| <phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote news:g5j9i70ftv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:25:45 +0200 "Szczepan Bia?ek" <sz.bialek@xxxxx>
|> wrote:
|> |
|> | <phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote news:g5fsot3g44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|> |> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:42:08 +0200 "Szczepan Bia?ek" <sz.bialek@xxxxx>
|> |> wrote:
|> |> | |
|> |> | Storm clouds are high voltage generators (Armstrong and Kelvin). As
|> such
|> |> | they must send electrons in ALL directions.
|> |>
|> |> How can a storm cloud generator a charge if it would send electrons in
|> all
|> |> directions? Do these new charges emerge from some kind of singularity
|> in
|> |> the middle of the cloud?
|> |
|> | A storm cloud generate the high VOLTAGE not a charge. The Earth has the
|> | excess of electrons so the atmosphere too. But currents and lightnings
|> take
|> | place only if the difference of voltage exist. Water droplets work like
|> the
|> | capacitor. Small drops in cloud small voltage, large drops large voltage
|> | (see Kelvins high voltage generator). In a storm cloud are stored heat
|> and
|> | electrons. The both must be dissipated when the cloud disappear.
|>
|> If there is a voltage and no current, there is a charge. That's the
|> initial
|> state of the clouds.
|>
|> A capacitor charged up has voltage and charge. Voltage is just the
|> density
|> of a change (the same charge spread over more capacitors has less
|> voltage).
|
| If small drops join together the charge is the same but the voltage rise.
| The volume is proportional to r^3 and capacitance to radius.
There's also the change in capacitance as lifting (thermal) takes place.
So the voltage rises. The distance rises along with that. Fluctuations
in the distance (turbulence) and many other things expose opportunities
for a discharge.
--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked. Due to ignorance |
| by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked. If you post to |
| Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |
.
- References:
- Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: Benj
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: Benj
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: Benj
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: Szczepan Białek
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: Szczepan Białek
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: Szczepan Białek
- Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Prev by Date: Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Next by Date: Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Previous by thread: Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Next by thread: Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|