Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: blackhead <larryharson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
On 12 Jul, 12:19, phil-news-nos...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
It seems there is an error in this Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction
Faraday's law says the induced EMF is in proportion to the rate of CHANGE
(my emphasis) of the magnetic flux. The article describes this much OK..
Later on, the article then says:
In the case of motional EMF, the idea is to move all or part of the
circuit through the magnetic field, for example, as in a homopolar
generator.
But this last case is a situation where the magnetic flux does not change..
Isn't this the aspect that Faraday saw as a paradox because it did not obey
his law of induction? Apparently he realized that no flux change happened
when he rotated the magnets with the rotating disk in his unipolar generator.
As I understand all this, there are TWO ways to induce electricity from a
magnetic field:
1. A conductor at a right angle to the magnetic field alignment experiencing
a change in the magnetic field flux density (strength). [Faraday's law
of induction]
2. Motion of a conductor at right angle to the magnetic field alignment and
simultaneously at right angle to the line of the conductor. [Fleming's
right hand rule, Lorentz force law]
The article seems to be trying to convert everything into one.
Which is correct, as far as Faraday's Law is concerned. The induced
EMF around a closed circuit is equal to the rate of change of flux
through the circuit and independent of whether it's the conductor or
the magnetic filed which is "moving".
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked. Due to ignorance |
| by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked. If you post to |
| Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- References:
- Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Prev by Date: Re: TRUE VALUE OF THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT REVEALED
- Next by Date: Re: Faraday paradox in non-circular form
- Previous by thread: Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Next by thread: Re: Error in Wikipedia article: Faraday's law of induction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|