Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)


"Vince Morgan" <vinharAtHereoptusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:48337050$0$13947$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Bill Miller" <billmillerkt4ye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vjGYj.2159$we7.1305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill strides manfully up the scaffold steps. He grabs the rope, slides it
over his head, positions his feet squarely over the trapdoor, grabs the
hanle and pulls hard...
**************************************************

But it DOES demonstrate, using well-established principles, that there is
a
reasonable explanation for the double slit puzzle. And that explanation
has
nothing to do with statistics nor with quantum mechanics.


Makes perfect sense to me, which may, or may not be a good thing.
Thank you Bill!

Yeah. It's too simple and sensible.

Much to be preferred is a model in which -- statistically -- an item is
sometimes a particle, sometimes a wave, and can also *see* the second slit,
calculate the pattern that would occur if a second idential item was also at
the second slit, and instantly morph itself into a near-exact replica of
that pattern.

Bill


.