Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- From: p.kinsler@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:41:32 +0100
Bill Miller <billmillerkt4ye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But it DOES demonstrate, using well-established principles, that there is a
reasonable explanation for the double slit puzzle. And that explanation has
nothing to do with statistics nor with quantum mechanics.
So do the maths and give the functional form for the double-slit
interfernce-like pattern using your model. Compare it with the
standard form. Are they the same or different? Is there a
difference significant enough so that your theory could (at least
in principle) be validated?
I'm not going to hold my breath, mind.
--
---------------------------------+---------------------------------
Dr. Paul Kinsler
Blackett Laboratory (QOLS) (ph) +44-20-759-47520 (fax) 47714
Imperial College London, Dr.Paul.Kinsler@xxxxxxxxxxx
SW7 2BW, United Kingdom. http://www.qols.ph.ic.ac.uk/~kinsle/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- From: Bill Miller
- Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- References:
- Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- From: Bill Miller
- Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA BRINGING CALAMITY TO MANKIND
- Next by Date: Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- Next by thread: Re: Double Slit Puzzle Explained (?)
- Index(es):