Re: Nearfield Electromagnetic Effects on Einstein Special Relativity
- From: John C. Polasek <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:19:06 -0500
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:17:47 +0200, William
<william.walker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Both Griffiths and I get the same solution for the B field generated by
an oscillating dipole (Griffiths- Ref equation just above Eq. 11.19, p.
447), compared to my solution Eq. 47). Note that the constants differ
because I use CGS units (as in Jackson EM) and Griffiths uses MKS units.
Unfortunately because of approximation 11.14 (r>>c/w i.e. kr>>1),
snip
You make a serious error using CGS instead of MKS because it lumps D
with E and B with H, which only a mathematician could accept. Where
are eps0 and mu0? What are their units? Is E =equal to V/m? Then so is
D but it makes no sense.
The CGS constitutive equations are a joke. P = 1/4pi(D - E) indeed.
John Polasek
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Displacement Current Demonstration
- Next by Date: Re: Displacement Current Demonstration
- Previous by thread: why does a "polywell" device contain electrons?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|