Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- From: "maxwell" <spsi@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Mar 2007 10:31:44 -0700
On Mar 24, 1:09 am, "Benj" <bjac...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
khrapko...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Sorry, Benj, in Newton's case it wasn't orthodoxy at work (the ususal
I think this rejection testifies to a crisis in the scientific
community. The community is incapable to accept new ideas. The
community defends the corporate interests. No one of the authors react
to my papers.
Resistant to new ideas is sure true, but a "crisis"? I doubt that.
Hey Dude, Don't you know that the Royal Society refused to publish
Newton's Principia and he had to have it published privately? The
more things change the more they stay the same!
Benj
case today) but crass economics/accounting - no-one had any budget for
such a specialized publication.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- From: Benj
- Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- References:
- Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- From: Benj
- Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- Prev by Date: Re: Displacement Current Demonstration
- Next by Date: Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- Previous by thread: Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- Next by thread: Re: Absurdity or jeer?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|