Re: New Electricity


"Don Kelly" <dhky@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AOh3g.69988$WI1.24726@xxxxxxxxxxx

No, I haven't failed to understand the derivation. However, some of the
terms as used, don't make sense . You treat n as the number of atoms per
unit length

I think n was the number of electrons per unit length. That is what I meant.

and e as the electron charge so you get n*e as the effective

line charge -apparently on the basis of 1 electron per atom (you didn't
answer that). However, you "don't think" that enters into it??? You then,
without any firm basis given, assume that n*e*v is the current. What about
the electrons that do not take part in conduction? They do not count
because they do not move.

However, what you have presented does have a basis in theory. It is NOT a
new idea that moving charges will produce a force acting on other charges.
In other words, the flux density B can be expressed in terms of the
electric field due to a moving charge and its velocity. (W.H. Hayt
"Engineering Electromagnetics" ,2nd Edition, 1967 discusses this in a
leadup to the "Lorentz Force Equation", A brief summary is in Gourishankar
& Kelly, "Electromechanical Energy Conversion"). Also refer to Maxwell's
equations. We use the magnetic field concept because it is easy to work
with, measure, and depends on measurable values such as current (number of
atoms/unit length and drift velocity are somewhat hard to work with).
Effectively, you are not presenting "new" concepts but rather some that
are well over 100 years old-possibly predating Maxwell.

I just showed that there was no magnetic field. The effect is due to the
force between charges.

Simply because "magnetic fields are due to moving charges", that doesn't
mean that they don't exist. Don't mix up the existence with the cause.
The magnetic field and its effect is the way we sense and measure the
field (region of influence).


You seem to have failed completely to understand this concept which as I say
was taught to me by Professor Stannard.

What you have failed to do is show an understanding of what you were
taught and this is shown in the definitions of some of your terms such as
"n", some of the "applications" that you propose.

It is likely that my definitions are not well presented.


True, I have not been polite. Why? possibly because:

a) you apparently do not actually understand what you are saying.
b)Your proposed transformer and motor ideas are nonsense.

There is nothing wrong with them.

c) Your Tesla reference is another "over unity device" Ho-hum

I only read a description.

d) Big business is after you - why?- you have nothing that is a threat.

It is not big business, it is the Church.

e) You don't know what a Tesla is and haven't heard of the Lorentz force
equation.

No that is absolutely true. I fail to any significance in not knowing
something that does not feature in my discusion.


Isn't that enough?

Yes, I'll just crawl away and hide.


Don Kelly @shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer

X

----------------------------


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Does a Magnets force weaken witht the distance cube?
    ... under "Electric Dipole Potential"? ... You are confusing the electric field of 3 charges ... " Elementary physics states that the magnetic field of a magnetic ... fields of moving electrons could be concentrated? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Electric Kite "Propulsion" Proposal
    ... That device charges up A, C, D to +q and charges up B to - ... open, is closed instantly, allowing electrons to flow from B up to the ... A on the other hand will be discharging, ... Now suppose I have a perpendicular, steady magnetic field. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Particle Visualization
    ... >> stationary electrons say can never react to a magnetic field and it is ... The field in the gap of your electro magnet is due to the charges in the ... that the magnetic cycle can induce a current in the vacuum. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Does a Magnets force weaken witht the distance cube?
    ... under "Electric Dipole Potential"? ... You are confusing the electric field of 3 charges ... " Elementary physics states that the magnetic field of a magnetic ... fields of moving electrons could be concentrated? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Redshift without expansion
    ... how much energy it carries. ... the energy of the released electrons is ... an equivelnt point in space and measures the EM wave? ... field is horizontal while the magnetic field is vertical. ...
    (sci.astro)
Loading