Re: O.T. Probably the best solution for Afghanistan
- From: "Jeffrey Hamilton" <bberesford@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:53:46 -0400
Fred J. McCall wrote:
"Jeffrey Hamilton" <bberesford@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
"Jeffrey Hamilton" <bberesford@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24/06/2011 13:20, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Black<blackusenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24/06/11 04:56, Kerryn Offord wrote:
On 6/23/2011 11:44 PM, deemsbill@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 23, 7:01 am, "dott.Piergiorgio"
<dott.PiergiorgioNI...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Il 23/06/2011 12:22, Andrew Swallow ha scritto:
Let's put a cordon around Afghanistan (the drug production
can be a good
and convenient excuse for a mild embargo) and forgot about
that really backward country, and the denizens of it.
The problems were that Al Qaeda did not stay bottled up in
Afghanistan and the Afghan authorities did not arrest bin
Laden, even when asked 3 times by the United Nations.
Any cordon would need backing up with a way of personally
punishing the President of Afghanistan if any terrorist
group attacks from Afghanistan.
seems that you don't have noticed that Afghani != AQ, or I'm
wrong ?
Yes, but the Afghans/Taliban aided...or maybe just
tolerated....AQ which allowed them base camps, rest areas,
training facilities, etc, etc. If terrorist groups have these
things, they are able to be much more effective.
You mean like Americans/American Irish tolerated/ aided the
IRA? And wouldn't extradite known terrorists (accused anyway)
when UK asked...
Careful now, you'll upset people.
Everyone knows there wasn't any serious terrorism until after
11th September 2001.
Except for the English, who think that all terrorism is Irish.
We are learning that other religions can produce terrorists.
But you (generic 'you', not you specifically) are still apparently
congenitally unable to discuss terrorism without almost
immediately reverting to wanking about the IRA (see above for yet
another example).
Who was it do you think, that generated all those terrorist attacks
in the UK, Fredfreaka ?
Since the discussion was about AFGHANISTAN, sane people would
consider that to be on the far side of irrelevant.
The discussion is about TERRORISM and who is or was harbouring the
terrorists.
No. The discussion is about AFGHANISTAN.
When the discussion is about Northern Ireland, feel free to bring it
up again.
The discussion is about TERRORISM and who is or was harbouring the
terrorists.
Well, you run along and have that discussion, then. I'll just
continue the one we've been having here.
Well then, Fredfreaka, you should respond to the subject that Andrew,
William, Kerryn and myself were discussing then, because the discussion had
evolved. Now of course, if _YOU_ are incapable of keeping up with the flow
of discussion, then perhaps it is you who should bow out until such time as
you have the capabilities and knowledge to engage in such, eh Fredfreaka ?
cheers......Jeff
.
- Prev by Date: Re: O.T. Probably the best solution for Afghanistan
- Next by Date: Re: O.T. Probably the best solution for Afghanistan
- Previous by thread: Re: O.T. Probably the best solution for Afghanistan
- Next by thread: Re: O.T. Probably the best solution for Afghanistan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
