Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Alan Lothian <alanlothian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:47:35 +0100
In article <9sv3651g0jorh758g220abm0ctd2tnqhkj@xxxxxxx>, Fred J. McCall
<fjmccall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<Paul here>
:The Phalanx pool is depleted at the moment ...
:
You could always buy some new ones, you know!
Can't do that, Fred. We need the money for vital stuff like this:
http://jobs.guardian.co.uk/job/890659/resilient-communities-partnership-
manager/
Picked almost at random from the silly public sector jobs advertised
weekly in the Grauniad. You can laugh if you like, you're not paying
the salaries: roughly 65k USD in this trifling instance.
When it comes to burning to the waterline, it isn't aluminium ships
that are the UK's biggest problem.
--
"The past resembles the future as water resembles water" -- Ibn Khaldun
If you wish to email me, try putting a dot between alan and lothian.
Blueyonder is a thing of the past.
.
- References:
- Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: hcobb
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Peter Granzeau
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Dennis
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Keith Willshaw
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Eugene Griessel
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: William Black
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Alan Dicey
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: hcobb
- Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- From: Paul J. Adam
- Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- Prev by Date: Re: Port Royal Navigation Skills
- Next by Date: Re: Cannonballs Really Could Sink Ships, Study Finds
- Previous by thread: Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- Next by thread: Re: Aluminum ships don't burn to the waterline?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|