Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: Eugene Griessel <eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:26:26 +0200
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:36:32 -0700 (PDT), Jack Linthicum
<jacklinthicum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 23, 7:54 am, Richard Casady <richardcas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:22:08 +0200, Eugene Griessel
<eug...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Depends what you call "uncommon" - I think there are currently around
140 or so astroblemes that are accepted on the surface of the earth as
having an extraterrestrial impact origin, probably many more under the
sea. Doubtless many more on land have been so eroded away that they
are no longer recognisable.
There is no reason to believe the earth has been hit either more or
less often than the moon. What with gravity the earth would be hit a
bit harder by any given rock, so the same bombardment would yield a
collection of slightly bigger craters.
Casady
I also have to ask if anyone else believes the effect of the Earth's
gravity on an incoming bolide is significant?
Not really - the more significant gravity field in the equation is
Jupiter. It has undoubtedly saved earth many times in the past from
incomings by perturbing the orbits. It has really been the big buddy.
By the time a large bolide's orbit is heading here it is hardly likely
that gravity plays a significant role in changing that orbital path.
Most of the large incoming stuff is tracked way beyond the orbit of
Mars and the minor alterations in course are very slight. If it is
going to get that close anyway we are probably doomed!
You can check the orbital elements for most life-threatening chunks on
the Harvard website - and these can be red into any number of astro
programs if you really want to know how doomed we are! I use Carte du
Ciel (which is a freebie) and it has an auto-updater link to the
Harvard site at:
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/Ephemerides/
Eugene L Griessel
Shotgun wedding - a case of Wife or Death.
- I post only from Sci.Military.Naval -
.
- References:
- Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: Richard Casady
- Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: damarkley
- Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: Eugene Griessel
- Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: Richard Casady
- Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Hudson bay as an impact crater
- Prev by Date: Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- Next by Date: Re: Once Brittan is no longer a nuclear power
- Previous by thread: Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- Next by thread: Re: Hudson bay as an impact crater
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|