Mumbai Carnage: The Police Story stands shattered
- From: PakistanPal <pakistanpal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Today, 18th December 2008, is a historic day. It marks the beginning
of a process wherein my `theory' about the Mumbai attack might just
turn out to be true. But there is no joy. There is just an emptiness,
a sadness at Karkare's death and the killing of hundreds of innocents
by the Hindutva-Mossad-CIA combine using factions in the ISI and
The Minorities Affairs Minister AR Antulay was once a firebrand
leader. But he has been quiet for long--too long; today he spoke and
questioned directly Karkare's killing in the Parliament. Antulay is a
cabinet Minister; he is not known to speak out of line. Despite
Abhishek Singhvi's remark distancing the Congress from what Antulay
said, the latter, it seems, definitely has the sanction of the
Congress High Command at some level. Anyone supposing something else
is deluding himself/herself.
Here is the text of the Times of India report:
Maintaining that "there is more than what meets the eyes", Antulay
said Karkare was investigating some cases in which "there are non-
Muslims also", an apparent reference to the Malegaon blasts case in
which sadhvi Pragya Thakur and a Lt-Colonel Shrikant Prasad Purohit
were among the 11 persons to be arrested.
"Unfortunately his end came. It may be a separate inquiry how his
(Karkare's) end came," he told reporters outside Parliament.
Antulay said "Karkare found that there are non-Muslims involved in the
acts of terrorism during his investigations in some cases. Any person
going to the roots of terror has always been the target, he said.
"Superficially speaking they (terrorists) had no reason to kill
Karkare. Whether he (Karkare) was victim of terrorism or terrorism
plus something. I do not know," he added.
When he came under attack in Lok Sabha on the issue, Antulay sought to
wriggle out saying he had not talked about who killed Karkare but
about "who sent him in the direction" of Cama hospital, outside which
he was killed.
"Who had sent them to Cama hospital (a lane opposite which he and two
other officers were killed by Pakistani terrorists on Nov 26). What
were they told that made them leave for the same spot in the same
"I repeat what I had said. I had not said who had killed them but only
questioned who had sent them there (Cama Hospital) in that direction,"
he said in Lok Sabha where BJP and Shiv Sena members attacked him for
Anant Geete of Shiv Sena accused him of "misleading" the house and
sought Chidambaram's clarification.
Earlier in the day, describing Hemant Karkare as a very bold officer
having great acumen and vision, Antulay asked "How come instead of
going to Hotel Taj or Oberai or even the Nariman House, he went to
such a place where there was nothing compared to what happened in the
"Why all the three (Hemant Karakre, Vijay Salaskar and Ashok Kamte)
went together. It is beyond my comprehension," the minister said.
The minister's remarks came under immediate attack from BJP which
asked the prime minister to clarify whether his remarks are an
"individual misdemeanour or the collective wisdom of the Cabinet".
"The remarks are obnoxious and deserves a clarification from the prime
minister," BJP spokesman Rajiv Pratap Rudy told reporters.
Reacting to Antulay's remarks, Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu
Singhvi they should be treated his "personal views" and Congress party
does not agree with them and does not support such a formulation.
To a question, he said there was no question of embarrassment to the
Samajwadi Party MP Amar Singh, who himself was in the centre of a
controversy when he had raised doubts over the killing of a Delhi
police official in an encounter recently, said a senior leader like
Antulay should before issuing any statement uphold the cherished
tradition of collective wisdom of the cabinet.
Not completely disapproving the remarks, Union minister Ram Vilas
Paswan said Antulay must be having "more information" since he hails
The issue came up when the house was discussing two bills brought in
by the government to tackle terror against the backdrop of Mumbai
Geete said the prime minister and several senior union ministers have
gone on record to say that Karkare was killed by terrorists.
Not satisfied with Antulay's reply, Geete charged the union minister
with "misleading" the house, which he "did not "expect".
The basic evil/criminal intent of BJP-Shiv Sena politics along with
their pathetic `soft' and `hard' supporters, stands exposed; the
questions here are vital: a cabinet minister, not an Independent
analyst, has questioned the Police theory about Karkare's death. Note
what Antulay is saying: WHO sent them there (Cama Hospital); how come
they were traveling together?
This is exactly what we have been asking---Antulay's statement means
that that he is hinting at the role of some top functionary WHO SEND
THEM THERE--(TO THEIR DEATHS)! Now put this in context with
proceedings that have begun against AN Roy, the Mumbai DGP, Hasan
Ghaffoor, the Mumbai Police Commissioner and the Maharashtra Home
What do you get? That the entire Police story put forward by the likes
of Rakesh Maria is suddenly under suspicion--so much for those savvy
journalists like Rajdeep Sardesai and Barkha Dutt. Rajdeep in fact
quoted Maria as his source and a reliable, honest officer--if he had
to sell himself I am sure he could have found a better buyer. He
should have learnt from Javed and Teesta.
This means that the entire police version might be wrong! Which means
that there is a question mark over Kasab and Ismail killing Karkare,
Salaskar and Kaamte. Which means that Kasab and Ismail might not have
killed the three; which then raises the question: who killed them? Was
it the Mumbai Police top brass? Or the Gujarat ATS under Narendra
Modi? Or a combination of the two--again--WHO SENT THEM THERE?
This means that there is sufficient doubt over Kasab's version! Which
means that Kasab's entire story of how he killed the three officers,
plus the entire thing that he is a Jehadi etc, is a plant, something
which our Police excels in! Which means that the so-called CCTV grabs
etc showing the footage of Kasab and Ismail were all fake! Aziz Burney
of the Rashtriya Sahara Urdu and the Marathi Press has said this in so
The Mumbai and the Indian Police has been known for keeping informers,
ex-militants and Pakistani spies in illegal confinement or on their
payroll. And then planting them in situations where either Police or
the corporate-politician-bureaucrat nexus or foreign powers or
Hindutva forces have carried out attacks and bomb blasts. This
happened on numerous occasions say, in 2006 when the RSS Headquarters
in Nagpur were attacked allegedly by `terrorists', who then died in an
encounter with the Nagpur Police. It later turned out, and this was
proved by Jusice Kondse Patil's report on this issue and by Suresh
Khairnar, a veteran socialist and human rights activist, that these
`terrorists' were in fact people who had been killed by a non-
Maharashtrian Special Crime Branch Police in a fake encounter and then
brought and placed before the RSS Headquarters. The Nagpur chief of
Police in fact went on record to say that his Police actually did not
engage in any encounter!
Now comes a report that Kasab was actually kidnapped by RAW officials
in Nepal in 2006. In fact a PIL has been filed in a Pakistani court
and the Times of India carried a report on this in its 17th December
In my last piece I had mentioned the Red Fort case. Indians, including
some leaders of so-called secular parties are so ill informed that
they do not even remember there was a Red Fort attack! They only know
of the Parliamentary attack, which was again a fake drama staged by
the Delhi Police--the best part is that our wily parliamentarians know
this! That is why they did not turn up to commemorate the `martyrdom'
of Police personal who died defending the Parliament!
Kasab is a fake; the real terrorists who came to Mumbai wreaked their
mayhem and went back safely--some of them, as testified by eye-witness
near Nariman House were definitely Israeli. The main aim of the entire
operaiton was to eliminate Karkare and to create something so big that
the Malegaon blast investigation pales in comparison.
But Karkare killers and Hindutva forces had the backing it seems of
Manmohan Singh. Why else would Advani meet Singh before 26th November
on the issue of `torture' of Praggya Singh? Has anyone heard of a
leader of the opposition meeting the Prime Minister on such an issue?
Apparently a deal was struck between them; and remember Advani could
not have met Singh like this, without American mediation.
Was Sonia in the knowhow? Probably not--the Sonia angle is very
important--there are reports that probably she was unaware of what
happened on 26th November and that depite throwing in her lot with the
Manmohan Singh lobby on other issues, she saw that their plan included
Karkare's killing is the result of the larger fight between Hindutva-
pro-Israeli, pro-American lobby which is now deeply entrenched in
India and whatever is left of Congress' old legacy in the
establishment. Both these factions often unite, as they did against
the Left on the nuclear deal issue. But the `old legacy' faction does
not realize that pro-US, pro-Israel lobby is planning to overthrow it--
and maybe sink Sonia and Rahul as well!
WHAT IS THE BIGGEST FAILURE OF THE CURRENT ESTABLISHMENT? NOT THAT
THERE WERE SECURITY LAPSES AND INTELLIGENCE FAILURE--THE BIGGEST
FAILURE IS THAT THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO COOK UP A FALSE STORY ABOUT A
TERRORIST ATTACK--THEY FAILED TO ESTABLISH A CONVINCING COVER-UP!
EVERYONE WHO HAS SUPPORTED THE POLICE THEORY HAS TO ANSWER. THE
VENGEANCE OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE WILL BE UPON YOU.
AND NOW COMES THE STARTLING FACT--KARKARE WAS KILLED BY A 9 MM BULLET--
WHICH COULD NOT HAVE COME FROM AK-47 OR 56! WHERE IS HIS POST-PARTUM
18th Dec 2008, 12:32 am.
source : http://www.unnindia.com/english/story.php?Id=3676
- Prev by Date: Re: Launching a V1 from a U-boat
- Next by Date: Re: Gorshkov pictorial
- Previous by thread: Bal Thackeray should shut up
- Next by thread: India ’Staged’ Mumbai Drama, Hotel Guests Testify