Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- From: azb@xxxxxxxxxx (Andrew Robert Breen)
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:03:17 +0000
In article <3dfij41714j240mrm6efbj2jictmvluf8r@xxxxxxx>,
Peter Skelton <skeltonp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:44:46 +0000, azb@xxxxxxxxxx (Andrew Robert
Breen) wrote:
In article <HsCdnfVzo7_Yh6TUnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,R&R both had it. Renown had a flared bow built higher, but the
<kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <hubl06xmoi.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, azb@xxxxxxxxxx (Andrew
Robert Breen) wrote:
Do away with the vestigal ram bow, replace with a clipper bow to
reduce spray interference.
The ram bow was retained to increase buoyancy forward. Increased flare
A longer bow, then? The ram certainly vanished over the war years. don't
think Refit and Repair had it.
bulge was still there (I'm looking at a photo.)
And I wasn't. OK: they had the bulge.
Hood didn't really, but there was added bouyancy below the
waterline at the bow
http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/great_britain/pages/battleships/hms_hood.htm
The KGV's of WWII didn't
http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/great_britain/battleships/prince_of_wales/hms_prince_of_wales.htm
nor did Nelsol and Rodnol (or, indeed, any of Goodall's battlship
designs?)
Much longer bow before A mounting than any WW1 ship, though.
on the bow would have helped keep spray out of the way and was IIRC used
on the later C classes.
Agree about more flare (and maybe a knuckle?). Actually, given that A
mount can't fire dead ahead at low elevations anyway (blast effects on
structure), how about a trawler blow like the later Cs?
Sounds good to me, but that's above the W/L, if bouyancy below is
needed, it can be provided without affecting that.
You've convinced me! The bulge stayes, but is (perhaps?) kept deeper below
the waterline. The aim is to avoid throwing up spray (or green water..),
and the more pronounced bulges seem to have been good at that.
{IIRC Dreadnought was originally designed with a straight bow, got a
ram-form bow for looks - and went a bit faster than anticipated as a
result. But it made her wetter]
More freeboard was needed in all of these ships - the cover of the UK
edition of Gordon's "Rules of the game" is striking. The two battleships
(QEs?) in not-that-dreadful weather are doing a pretty good impression of
half-tide rocks..
--
Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
.
- References:
- Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- From: Andrew Robert Breen
- Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- From: kenney
- Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- From: Andrew Robert Breen
- Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- From: Peter Skelton
- Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- Prev by Date: Re: Russia to send warship through Panama Canal
- Next by Date: Re: 20-foot waves on Oahu North Shore, where Turtledove landed his Japanese in 1941
- Previous by thread: Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- Next by thread: Re: A naval 'what would you do?'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading