sci.military.naval

• Date Index

---

• Judge Rules White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed, Jack Linthicum
• For those who question political posts on this newsgroup, Jack Linthicum
• Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, frank
    • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, William Black
      • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, William Black
      • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering, dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Fritz-X What-If, Andre Ilausky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fritz-X What-If, Keith Willshaw
  • Re: Fritz-X What-If, mike
    • Re: Fritz-X What-If, dott.Piergiorgio
• Navy News Service for Wednesday, July 30, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Cap'n Crunch
  • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Tiger
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Cap'n Crunch
  • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Roger Conroy
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, La N
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, CJ Adams
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, scott s.
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Peter Skelton
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Derek Lyons
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Roger Conroy
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Tiger
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Vincent Brannigan
      • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, scott s.
    • Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage, Tiger
• A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew, dumpster4
  • Re: A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew, Roger Conroy
      • Re: A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew, dott.Piergiorgio
• Musing about muzzleloaders, ohara5 . 0
  • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, Don Ocean
    • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, a425couple
      • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, mike
  • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, Tiger
    • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, dott.Piergiorgio
  • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Musing about muzzleloaders, dott.Piergiorgio
• This would never happen in the United States Navy, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: This would never happen in the United States Navy, a425couple
• Austal coverup of LCS overruns discovered., hcobb
  • Re: Austal coverup of LCS overruns discovered., g lof2
• Air Force nominee Schwartz faces questions about Iraq testimony, Jack Linthicum
• Seminar on 1715 Treasure Fleet at Satellite Beach Library, Jack Linthicum
• C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants, William Black
• Gorkhas of Assam support, PakistanPal
• Indian Politics: Wrong Foundations, PakistanPal
• Pelosi: 'I'm trying to save the planet', Cap'n Crunch
  • Re: Pelosi: 'I'm trying to save the planet', Mark Test
• Re: ACR-4 -- USS Pennsylvania/ USS Pittsburgh, William Hamblen
  • Re: ACR-4 -- USS Pennsylvania/ USS Pittsburgh, Andre Lieven
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ACR-4 -- USS Pennsylvania/ USS Pittsburgh, William Hamblen
• Wilmington recognized as Coast Guard City, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The Untold Story of the Cold War's Most Daring Mission, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Golez appointed new chief of Philippine Navy, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Parade of Ships join Coast Guard Festival, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy commander fired after running ship aground, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Italian submarine arriving at Norfolk Naval Station Friday, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Russia sets submarine depth record, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Re: Russia sets submarine depth record, Dan
    • Re: Russia sets submarine depth record, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Russia sets submarine depth record, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russia sets submarine depth record, John Dallman
    • Re: Russia sets submarine depth record, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russia sets submarine depth record, Dan
• I Served... Otto J Ernst, W2vm,, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Importance of Malta WWII, Rich Johnson
  • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Importance of Malta WWII, Jack Linthicum
• RIMPAC ends, John Szalay
  • Re: RIMPAC ends, Jack Linthicum
• Not quite O.T. as it is booze related, La N
• A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos, William Black
      • Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos, William Black
      • Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• More than 22,000 veterans sought help from suicide hot line in its first year, government says, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: More than 22,000 veterans sought help from suicide hot line in its first year, government says, La N
    • Re: More than 22,000 veterans sought help from suicide hot line in its first year, government says, Kerryn Offord
• Comment: Should Buddha smile again? —Zawar Abidi, PakistanPal
• Indian PM Singh wins trust vote in Parliament but Opp says it is victory of horse-trading, PakistanPal
• Russia To Revamp Navy With New Aircraft Carriers And Submarines, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The Sinking of the USS Indianapolis, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy Cancels Battleship, Tough Choices Ahead Mike Burleson, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• More sailors needed for Canada's warships, navy brass says, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• First World War submarine moved after 90 years, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Russian Navy Talks Carriers on Annual Fleet Day, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy veterans tribute bill lands in Congress, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• No scuttle at Scapa, ohara5 . 0
  • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
    • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, guy
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, guy
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, John Dallman
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, kenney
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, BF Lake
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, kenney
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, guy
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, mike
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, mike
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, mike
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, guy
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, kenney
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Keith Willshaw
  • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, nik Simpson
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
  • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, William Hamblen
  • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, J
    • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Peter Skelton
    • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: No scuttle at Scapa, Peter Skelton
• Pentagon flexes its altruism muscle, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, idontexist
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, BlackBeard
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards, Raymond O'Hara
• FREE Vietnam War Memorial Wall Card, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served...PO2C Carl D Lowery, Vwae, Ndsm, Cwm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• womens lib comes to Iraq., Raymond O'Hara
• Brian Williams interview with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NBC, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Brian Williams interview with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NBC, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Brian Williams interview with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NBC, guy
• New Produced Luxury Residence - Classified Preview 2008/11, rogerkolsson@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Issue Requirements: Acknowledgement of Responsibility Award, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• more bush crimes pelosi will ignore., Raymond O'Hara
• Black powder, not a naval topic though, ohara5 . 0
  • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
    • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, ohara5 . 0
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, mike
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, mike
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, David E. Powell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, ohara5 . 0
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
    • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
  • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Rich Johnson
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Peter Stickney
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Barbarossa
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeffrey Hamilton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Rich Johnson
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Andrew Chaplin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, mike
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Kerryn Offord
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, William Black
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, mike
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, scott s.
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, CJ Adams
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Jeff Crowell
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, george
      • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though, kenney
• Rhode Island: Russian sub raised from river, David E. Powell
• I Served...PO3C Esther M Rosales, Cwm, Swasm, Gcm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• ssue Regulations: The Antarctica Service Medal, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: British Newspaper Makes Fun Of & Mocks Barack Obama, Jim Yanik
• Re: Service Dress Khaki May Be Coming Back, ropeyarn@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Service Dress Khaki May Be Coming Back, CJ Adams
• Alaska fishing boats and submarines, David E. Powell
  • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Tiger
  • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Tiger
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, a425couple
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, David E. Powell
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, tankfixer
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, tankfixer
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, tankfixer
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, tankfixer
      • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines, John Szalay
• Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV, David E. Powell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV, Matt Wiser
    • Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV, frank
      • People's Republic Newgroup, eyeball
• O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, La N
  • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, La N
    • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Jim E
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Peter Stickney
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Richard Casady
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida, Raymond O'Hara
• Issue Regulations: Vietnam Campaign Medal (U.S. and Allied), Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• McCain out to sink LCS, hcobb
  • Re: McCain out to sink LCS, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: McCain out to sink LCS, hcobb
      • Re: McCain out to sink LCS, Fred J . McCall
• Re: Obama Scraps Visit To Wounded Troops, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Navy's top admiral urges less talk, more action on diversity, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Navy News Service for Friday, July 25, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Vietnam-era Navy river patrol boat available for tours during, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Aussie submarine sinks retired US warship, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy chaplain faces rape, assault charges, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• MILITARY: 'Pacific Strike' moving heavy gear from ship to shore, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Residents plan protest of RimPac military exercise, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• aliban Exploit Sectarian Rift in Siege of Shiites in Pakistan Enclave, Jack Linthicum
• Generics Monopoly in the making , neocon landgrab , tax evasion and foreign armies, fusion
• Barbara Schwarz finally talks about the government again, APP interviews
• Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Tiger
    • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, frank
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, george
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
    • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Matt Wiser
    • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, David E. Powell
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, tankfixer
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Tiger
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, tankfixer
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, David E. Powell
  • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
    • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
    • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Paul J. Adam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Paul J. Adam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Richard Casady
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, William Black
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, tankfixer
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, William Black
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, Andre Ilausky
  • Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols, tankfixer
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967, Don Ocean
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Liberty Incident 1967, Jewdas
    • Re: The Liberty Incident 1967, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Liberty Incident 1967, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: The Liberty Incident 1967, Andrew Chaplin
    • Re: The Liberty Incident 1967, William Black
• 24 Jul 2008 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Dan Olecki
  • Message not available
    • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, g lof2
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Tiger
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Tiger
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, tankfixer
    • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, David E. Powell
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, tankfixer
    • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Tiger
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, William Black
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, tankfixer
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Roger Conroy
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Alan Lothian
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!, tankfixer
• U.S. Navy Ticonderoga- class cruiser fires Tomahawk Block IV missile, yeknom-ecaps
  • Re: U.S. Navy Ticonderoga- class cruiser fires Tomahawk Block IV missile, frank
• Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, guy
  • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, guy
  • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Paul J. Adam
    • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, nik Simpson
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, guy
  • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, William Black
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, William Black
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Christopher Manteuffel
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Tiger
  • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Tiger
  • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, John Dallman
    • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, guy
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, John Dallman
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question, guy
• Interesting advert, William Black
  • Re: Interesting advert, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Interesting advert, William Black
      • Re: Interesting advert, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Interesting advert, David Biddulph
      • Re: Interesting advert, William Black
      • Re: Interesting advert, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Interesting advert, CJ Adams
      • Re: Interesting advert, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Interesting advert, William Black
      • Re: Interesting advert, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Interesting advert, William Black
      • Re: Interesting advert, Richard Casady
      • Re: Interesting advert, William Black
      • Re: Interesting advert, David Biddulph
      • Re: Interesting advert, Richard Casady
      • Re: Interesting advert, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Interesting advert, CJ Adams
• Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, dumpster4
  • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Tiger
    • Message not available
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
    • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Andre Ilausky
    • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Don Ocean
    • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Tiger
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, David E. Powell
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, dumpster4
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, dumpster4
      • Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot, Richard Casady
• A naval love story, La N
  • Re: A naval love story, a425couple
• Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler, Andrew Chaplin
    • Re: Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler, Jack Linthicum
• High-Stakes Race to Unlock a Wider Web; Critics Say New Technology May Hinder TV Signals, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: High-Stakes Race to Unlock a Wider Web; Critics Say New Technology May Hinder TV Signals, Arved Sandstrom
• Hunting Season Supplier, Mutual Assets
• No Singh song this, PakistanPal
• USCG/Cocaine Bust, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Rell Bolsters Efforts To Protect Submarine Base, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy scraps new destroyer, to build older models, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Coast Guard to get new cutter, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US Navy Conducts Flight Test of Tomahawk Block IV Missile, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• WWII museum plans more focus on subs, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Report: Pentagon auditors pressured to 'skew' reports on military, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Re: Report: Pentagon auditors pressured to 'skew' reports on military, frank
• Issue Regulations: Occupation Service Medal - Army, Navy, Marine, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• After 60 years, black officers rare, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy all at sea about LCS crew details, hcobb
  • Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details, Tiger
      • Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Oil Price Drops $6.44/Barrel (only 4.4 % )-- Bush had nothing to do with it -- supply and demand at work, Jim Yanik
  • Re: Oil Price Drops $6.44/Barrel (only 4.4 % )-- Bush had nothing to do with it -- supply and demand at work, Jack Linthicum
• Generals sweat (literally) out the health-care interogation, Jack Linthicum
• Importance of Madrid conference, PakistanPal
• Future U.S. Navy Shipbuilding, Dan Olecki
  • Re: Future U.S. Navy Shipbuilding, Tiger
• 15 percent of women in the military have suffered sexual trauma., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Re: 15 percent of women in the military have suffered sexual trauma., frank
    • Re: 15 percent of women in the military have suffered sexual trauma., Tiger
• Is It Time to Segregate the Military By Sex, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, frank
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jeffrey Hamilton
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, tankfixer
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Mark Test
      • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jim Watt
  • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Dennis
    • Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys, Jack Linthicum
• Issue Regulations: Coast Guard Achievement, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• List Of Military Discussion/Info-Sharing Groups, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Army slow to process injuries, Jack Linthicum
• Our very own War Criminal, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Our very own War Criminal, frank
• Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, hcobb
  • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, scott s.
    • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, g lof2
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, Tiger
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, Tiger
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, hcobb
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, hcobb
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks, g lof2
• Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, mike
  • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, David E. Powell
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, William Black
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, William Black
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, William Black
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, tankfixer
    • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Tiger
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, William Black
  • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, hcobb
  • Russia denies reported Cuba base plans, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba, Dennis
• Foreign military ships blocked in Odesa port during three hours, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Servicemembers hear perspectives of 'women in the military', Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served...S2C William F Hale, W2vm, Phm, Hd., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, Dean A. Markley
  • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, a425couple
      • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, Dennis
      • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, a425couple
      • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, Dean A. Markley
  • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, William Hamblen
    • Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943, frank
• CNN Short bit on Persian Gulf patrols, Jack Linthicum
• NOAA goes diving for U-boats in North Carolina: "It's really the only place where you can visit the battlefield of the Atlantic.", Jack Linthicum
  • Re: NOAA goes diving for U-boats in North Carolina: "It's really the only place where you can visit the battlefield of the Atlantic.", Weatherlawyer
• I Served...CPL Ronald L Gronau, Vsm, Ndsm, Cwm, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• For 'Surge' Troops, Pride Mingles With Doubt, Jack Linthicum
• B-52 bomber crashes near Guam, crew missing., David E. Powell
• EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, hcobb
  • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, Andre Ilausky
    • Message not available
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, Roger Conroy
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, William Black
      • Message not available
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, William Black
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, hcobb
      • Message not available
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, hcobb
  • Message not available
    • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, Andre Ilausky
      • Message not available
      • Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden, Andre Ilausky
• The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Jeff Dougherty
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, David Lesher
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, David Lesher
  • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, John Mianowski
    • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Michael Shirley
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, BlackBeard
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Peter Skelton
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Tiger
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, BlackBeard
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, tankfixer
      • Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover, tankfixer
• Riddle of Lusitania sinking may finally be solved; American entrepreneur Gregg Bemis finally gets courts go-ahead to explore the wreck off Ireland, Jack Linthicum
• Many military officers are pushing back against Defense Secretary Gates' focus on preparing for more 'asymmetric' fighting rather than for a large, conventional conflict., Jack Linthicum
• Re: Nazi Krauthammer = the exterminable fascist, Dennis
• Navy News Service for Friday, July 18, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy News Service for Thursday, July 17, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Issue Regulations: China War Memorial Medal, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• satire?, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: satire?, Weatherlawyer
• Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Says Drill! Drill! Drill! -- Oil Price Drops $9/Barrel, frank
  • Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Says Drill! Drill! Drill! -- Oil Price Drops $9/Barrel, Andrew Swallow
    • Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Says Drill! Drill! Drill! -- Oil Price Drops $9/Barrel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He, Peter Skelton
      • Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He, Jack Linthicum
• Stolen Laptops - Juststolen.Net, Crime reporting group
• Captain America Clone Considered for Movie Role. Steve Rogers in the flesh? You decide!, Brenda Blog
  • Re: Captain America Clone Considered for Movie Role. Steve Rogers in the flesh? You decide!, Jack Linthicum
• Issue Regulations: Republic of Vietnam Wound Medal, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Matt Wiser
  • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Raymond O'Hara
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Matt Wiser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Matt Wiser
    • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Matt Wiser
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Jim Watt
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, Kerryn Offord
      • Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Warships as war graves?, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Warships as war graves?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Warships as war graves?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Warships as war graves?, William Black
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Keith Willshaw
  • Re: Warships as war graves?, Keith Willshaw
  • Re: Warships as war graves?, Matt Wiser
    • Re: Warships as war graves?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, guy
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, William Hamblen
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, a425couple
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Richard Casady
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Lyle
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
    • Re: Warships as war graves?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Richard Casady
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Richard Casady
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Dennis
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, R.C. Payne
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, William Black
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, William Black
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, William Hamblen
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, nik Simpson
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, nik Simpson
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Richard Casady
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, guy
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Dennis
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, John Szalay
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, Tiger
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Warships as war graves?, John Szalay
• Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect, Tiger
  • New study estimates vast supplies of Arctic oil, gas, 90 Bbbl, Jack Linthicum
• New Navy uniform goes retro, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Kennebunk woman retraces steps of veteran father, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Dan
    • Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine, Peter Skelton
• Happy Homecoming for Navy pilots, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Fire in Submarine in Groton Under Investigation, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Midshipmen embed with Marines on CARAT, taste Corps life, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Effort is delayed in raising Russian submarine that sank in, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served... LCPL Donald P Gouthro, Vsm, Vcog, Cwm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Phil Gramm given the boot, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Mark Test
    • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Mark Test
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, tankfixer
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Vaughn Simon
    • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Leadfoot
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, La N
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, tankfixer
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, tankfixer
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, tankfixer
      • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Leadfoot
  • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Phil Gramm given the boot, Raymond O'Hara
• I Served... BM3 Richard H Hamming, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• President Bush, or maybe just his Press Secretary, says agreements now under negotiation to include a general time horizon for meeting aspirational goals, Jack Linthicum
  • Now al Maliki agrees with Obama, not Bush or his Press Secretary, Jack Linthicum
• For those who have landed in Subic, Jack Linthicum
• Al-Qaida draws more foreign recruits to Afghan war, Jack Linthicum
• Terrorism Funds May Let Brass Fly in Style, Jack Linthicum
• Drug submarine?, brandon
  • Re: Drug submarine?, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Drug submarine?, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Drug submarine?, Tiger
    • Re: Drug submarine?, Airyx
      • Re: Drug submarine?, Dennis
• Re: Kennedy In The Cuban Missile Crisis, Dennis
• Re: Oral tradition, what it is, what it ain't. was On the need for Poets and Poetry after TSHTF, Dennis
• What If, ebe
  • Re: What If, ebe
    • Re: What If, ebe
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: What If, William Black
    • Re: What If, Tiger
    • Re: What If, ebe
      • Re: What If, Peter Stickney
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Peter Stickney
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Richard Casady
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, William Hamblen
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Richard Casady
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Peter Skelton
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: What If, Raymond O'Hara
  • Message not available
    • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: What If, Peter Skelton
      • Re: What If, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Roger Conroy
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Peter Skelton
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, William Hamblen
      • Re: What If, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: What If, guy
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Peter Skelton
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: What If, William Black
      • Re: What If, scott s.
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: What If, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: What If, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What If, William Hamblen
• "Freedom fries" die as France embraces the hamburger, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: "Freedom fries" die as France embraces the hamburger, Vaughn Simon
  • Re: "Freedom fries" die as France embraces the hamburger, Tiger
• I say we all chip in and buy Hines one of these, Jack Linthicum
• Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", John Dallman
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Dennis
    • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", David Loewe, Jr.
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service", deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• I Served... SGT Dennis M Witt, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Disenfathomabilia., Weatherlawyer
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Matt Wiser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Billzz
    • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Jim Yanik
  • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Dan
  • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Jim Yanik
  • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War, Peter Skelton
• Navy News Service for Wednesday, July 16, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Senate committee approves Coast Guard spending bill, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Sub named after Granite State can be tracked online, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Launching of the first Class 209PN Submarine for the Portuguese, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Re: Launching of the first Class 209PN Submarine for the Portuguese, amg
• Analysis: East Fleet prepares -- Part 1, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Tiger
    • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, frank
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Tiger
    • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, Tiger
      • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, John Dallman
  • Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?, David Loewe, Jr.
• Shore duty for the SM-3, dumpster4
  • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, dumpster4
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, dumpster4
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, dumpster4
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Andrew Venor
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, tankfixer
  • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Shore duty for the SM-3, David E. Powell
• War and Peacetime Military Event Chronology, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Military Glossary and Dictionary, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, ebe
  • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Jack Linthicum
      • US plans to station diplomats in Iran for first time since 1979, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Peter Skelton
      • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, tankfixer
  • Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator, Tiger
• Iran Says Deterring Foes, to Hold Air Force Drill, Jack Linthicum
• US Navy: 30 tons of narcotics seized in Gulf, cutting off possible, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• 'Filipinos in the US Navy & Coast Guard During the Vietnam War, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Lady Thatcher To Be Honoured With State Funeral - First For PM, John Dallman
  • Re: Lady Thatcher To Be Honoured With State Funeral - First For PM, Jim Watt
• blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Gernot Hassenpflug
  • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Andrew Robert Breen
    • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Roger Conroy
      • Message not available
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, guy
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, guy
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, guy
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, kenney
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Pete Granzeau
      • Message not available
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Joe Osman
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?, Joe Osman
• blue on blue: minesweeper squadron sunk in 1944?, Gernot Hassenpflug
• 14 Jul 2008 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Want to catch a president?, Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Want to catch a president?, Tiger
    • Re: Want to catch a president?, Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Want to catch a president?, guy
    • Re: Want to catch a president?, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Want to catch a president?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Want to catch a president?, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: Want to catch a president?, William Black
      • Re: Want to catch a president?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Want to catch a president?, Andrew Swallow
    • Re: Want to catch a president?, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Want to catch a president?, Jeffrey Hamilton
• Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, dumpster4
  • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Tiger
    • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, g lof2
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, g lof2
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, guy
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Tiger
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Tiger
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer, dumpster4
• European parliament passes resolution against mass graves in Kashmir, PakistanPal
  • Re: European parliament passes resolution against mass graves in Kashmir, Raymond O'Hara
• Irony, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Irony, tankfixer
    • Re: Irony, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Irony, tankfixer
      • Re: Irony, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Irony, tankfixer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Irony, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Irony, Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, John Dallman
  • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Ken Chaddock
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, John Dallman
• Yellow submarine: Unmanned sub studies ocean as it glides to Spain, Jack Linthicum
• Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, hcobb
  • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, hcobb
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, hcobb
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, hcobb
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, g lof2
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Michael Shirley
  • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, David E. Powell
  • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Tiger
  • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, hcobb
      • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, dott.Piergiorgio
  • Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack, Dennis
• Fourth Fleet reporting for duty, hcobb
• New Saudi Arabia university will have a Western feel, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Iran will target US bases if attacked, Matt Wiser
• China 'is fuelling war in Darfur', Andrew Swallow
• Re: Rakkaus voittaa?, Ilppo Kuisma
• Issue Regulations: The Vietnam War Era Service Recognition, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, sappr67@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
    • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, a425couple
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Dean A. Markley
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shape- into PoW ?, a425couple
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Dan
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, guy
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Richard Casady
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, guy
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Richard Casady
    • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Derek Lyons
    • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, a425couple
  • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Taki Kogoma
    • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Per Nordenberg
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, CJ Adams
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, CJ Adams
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Kerryn Offord
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Richard Casady
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, William Hamblen
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Richard Casady
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Kerryn Offord
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, tankfixer
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, tankfixer
    • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, a425couple
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Dennis
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, guy
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, William Hamblen
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Richard Casady
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, guy
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, guy
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, William Hamblen
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Dennis
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, guy
      • Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Shaped Charge -more ASW, a425couple
• US Navy Revives Command for Latin America, Caribbean, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US Navy Establishing First Ever Major Presence in SA, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
  • Pearl Harbour. This is in response to a post from Otis Willie. There is no need to respond to the OP., Weatherlawyer
    • Re: Pearl Harbour. This is in response to a post from Otis Willie. There is no need to respond to the OP., Keith Willshaw
• Congress Calls On Experts To Formulate New "Grand Military Strategy, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Expedition to Survey Sunken U-Boats Off North Carolina, Jack Linthicum
• Never O.T. in this group - Beer (is there anything it can't do?), La N
• Book Report and more, Jack Linthicum
• A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Greek Sea Looted by Divers, kenney
  • Re: Greek Sea Looted by Divers, dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: vvv, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: vvv, ebe
    • Re: vvv, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: vvv, Don Ocean
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: vvv, ebe
  • Re: vvv, Dennis
• Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Mark Test
  • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Dennis
    • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Dennis
      • Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm, Fred J . McCall
• Fourth public affairs director in a recent years gets fired, thought the families of the dead should control media attention not the Army., Jack Linthicum
  • Army Secretary Asks for Probe of Firing of Arlington Cemetary. Public Affairs Officer, Jack Linthicum
• The Persian Paradox: Why is so much sensitive US military technology winding up in Iran? ", Jack Linthicum
  • Re: The Persian Paradox: Why is so much sensitive US military technology winding up in Iran? ", Michael Shirley
    • Re: The Persian Paradox: Why is so much sensitive US military technology winding up in Iran? ", David E. Powell
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., ironduff003
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Mark Borgerson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Rich Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jim Yanik
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Roger Conroy
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Richard Casady
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Richard Casady
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jim Yanik
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Richard Casady
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Roger Conroy
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Richard Casady
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Richard Casady
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Tiger
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Roger Conroy
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., BlackBeard
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., BlackBeard
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Derek Lyons
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Fred J . McCall
    • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Sub-launched UAVs..., Dennis
• IRAM = RPG + IED, Jack Linthicum
• Luxury Saudi prison camp, Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Luxury Saudi prison camp, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: Luxury Saudi prison camp, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ], ebe
  • Re: Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ], ebe
    • Re: Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ], Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ], ebe
• Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America, Matt Wiser
  • Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America, Michael Shirley
      • Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America, Mark Test
• Re: British and American Black Ops in Iraq: State-Sponsored Terror - the Killing of Innocents so they can "respond" to Terrorism, Matt Wiser
• Re: Good article on the Staights and Iran, Jack Linthicum
• OVS Medal: Red Cross seeks military call center volunteers, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• FYI Iran, ebe
  • Re: FYI Iran, Richard Casady
• Dollar hit by Iranian missile, hcobb
  • Re: Dollar hit by Iranian missile, Mark Test
    • Re: Dollar hit by Iranian missile, hcobb
• The “Angry Hindus” And The Muslims, PakistanPal
• Russians reflect on Afghan conflict, PakistanPal
• Pakistan rejects Kabul bombing link, PakistanPal
• Is India Pakistan’s nemesis?, PakistanPal
• A CRISIS OF POLICY AND THE SOVEREIGNTY QUESTION, PakistanPal
• DD-214 Discharge and Re-enlistment Codes Online, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Issue Regulations: Combat Action Awards, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Issue Regulations: Vietnam Campaign Medal, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Indian Navy ship to be immortalised as artificial reef, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Indian Naval chief visits France ahead of global submarine tenders, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Issue Regulations: Primary Leadership Development Ribbon, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Test Post - Am I Being Spiked, ebe
  • Re: Test Post - Am I Being Spiked, Andrew Swallow
• Re: Telecom bill (I support the Feingold Amendment to this Bill), ebe
• Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Andrew Swallow
    • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives, Raymond O'Hara
• Pentagon says it's moving some strike jets to worrisome Afghan mission as Iraq improves, Jack Linthicum
• Iran to burn down its vital interests around the globe, hcobb
• The War In The Pacific, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Delaware Takes Part in Navy Week, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Reporting from Iraq: Seabees battle heat, family separation at, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US holds navy exercise after Iran comments on Gulf, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Last Vietnam combat veteran in Coast Guard's ranks retiring, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• USS Nimiz; made for tv military, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Comments on the Wire tapping Immunity Bill, ebe
  • Re: Comments on the Wire tapping Immunity Bill, Raymond O'Hara
• More than you will probably ever want to know about whales and sonar, Jack Linthicum
• Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion, Mark Borgerson
• SURVEY: Should the United States Pre-emptively Attack Iran?, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre, dott.Piergiorgio
  • Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre, Tiger
  • Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre, Matt Wiser
    • Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre, Matt Wiser
• Where the fnord is the LCS?, hcobb
  • Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?, hcobb
  • Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?, Tiger
  • Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?, Michael Shirley
• ASDIC hut saved from demolition, Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Rum, the Lash and..., William Black
  • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., R.C. Payne
  • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., a425couple
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., Tiger
  • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., kenney
    • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., Tiger
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., Tiger
      • Re: Rum, the Lash and..., tankfixer
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Michael Shirley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, John Dallman
    • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, John Dallman
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, wrhamblen
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, John Dallman
  • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Matt Wiser
    • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Jim Watt
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, The . Sargon
    • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Matt Wiser
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Jim Watt
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy, Matt Wiser
• Japanese Suicide Boats, John
  • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Tiger
    • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Jeffrey Hamilton
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Jeffrey Hamilton
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Jeffrey Hamilton
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Weatherlawyer
    • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Robert Sveinson
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Tiger
  • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, John
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Bob L
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Michael Shirley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Raymond O'Hara
  • Message not available
    • Re: Japanese Suicide Boats, Michael Shirley
• What would people say, ebe
  • Re: What would people say, ebe
    • Re: What would people say, ebe
    • Re: What would people say, ebe
  • Re: What would people say, Mark Sieving
  • Re: What would people say, Keith Willshaw
  • Re: What would people say, Peter Skelton
• Re: Re: Ron Paul: I hear members of Congress saying “i, Matt Wiser
• Re: Randy Massachusetts Schoolgirls Abuse Innocent Boys., John Doe
• I Served... MMC Brys Richard L, Gcm, Cwm, Vsm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• French Submarines in the Mediterranean - 1917, sappr67@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: French Submarines in the Mediterranean - 1917, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: French Submarines in the Mediterranean - 1917, Starshiy
• UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Dean A. Markley
  • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
    • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
    • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Tiger
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, R.C. Payne
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Tiger
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, R.C. Payne
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, John Dallman
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, William Black
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, William Black
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, R.C. Payne
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Jeff
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Tiger
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Jeff
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: UK aircraft carriers, William Black
    • Message not available
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Tiger
  • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Pete Granzeau
    • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, William Black
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Derek Lyons
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Derek Lyons
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Derek Lyons
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Derek Lyons
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Derek Lyons
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Justin
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Justin
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Jeff
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, hcobb
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, tankfixer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, hcobb
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Richard Casady
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Tiger
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, William Black
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Jim Watt
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, William Black
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Tiger
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Warspite
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Warspite
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, tankfixer
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Derek Lyons
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, R.C. Payne
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, R.C. Payne
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Richard Casady
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, R.C. Payne
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
      • Re: UK aircraft carriers, Michael Shirley
    • Re: UK aircraft carriers, guy
• Colorado Seabees turn over keys to help, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US Navy has adopted new rules to help protect marine mammals, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Rimpac Attracts Ten Nations; Largest Military Excercise, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served... CPL Jason G Huhman, Gwera, Ndsm, Gcm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Looking for people who served who served in the military..., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served... LCPL James F Klein, Vsm, Vcog, Cwm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• A Tale of Two Subs, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: A Tale of Two Subs, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: A Tale of Two Subs, BlackBeard
      • Re: A Tale of Two Subs, Jack Linthicum
  • Message not available
    • Re: A Tale of Two Subs, Jack Linthicum
• Project: 1135 (Burevestnik) "Deyatelny". NATO Class Name: "Krivak I" in 1:250 scale., Alexander Blokhin
  • Re: Project: 1135 (Burevestnik) "Deyatelny". NATO Class Name: "Krivak I", Jeffrey Hamilton
• Saudi Arabia to buy French frigate for kickbacks, hcobb
• US Navy spends more for less., hcobb
  • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
  • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Derek Lyons
    • Re: US Navy spends more for less., hcobb
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Keith Willshaw
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Tiger
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Michael Shirley
      • Re: US Navy spends more for less., Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sea Invasion, John Dallman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sea Invasion, Richard Casady
    • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
  • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
    • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, tankfixer
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Christopher Manteuffel
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Christopher Manteuffel
      • Re: Sea Invasion, tankfixer
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, tankfixer
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, kenney
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Andre Ilausky
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Christopher Manteuffel
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Sea Invasion, tankfixer
      • Re: Sea Invasion, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sea Invasion, tankfixer
• Lawmaker Rules Out 2008 Approval of U.S.-Indian Deal, PakistanPal
• Challenge to India's secular traditions, PakistanPal
• Navy News Service for Thursday, July 03, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Air Force, Navy JAGs nominated for third star, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Precisely (Non political, non religious) What is the definition of a state secret, ebe
  • Re: Precisely (Non political, non religious) What is the definition of a state secret, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Precisely (Non political, non religious) What is the definition of a state secret, Raymond O'Hara
• WWII Convoy Ops query, David Lesher
  • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, ebe
    • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, William Black
  • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, BF Lake
    • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, David Lesher
  • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, Roger Conroy
    • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, David Lesher
  • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, John Dallman
  • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, William Black
  • Re: WWII Convoy Ops query, Arved Sandstrom
• Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, hcobb
  • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, YMC
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, hcobb
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, wrhamblen
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jeff Dougherty
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, kenney
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, hcobb
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Dean A. Markley
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, David V. Loewe, Jr
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, mike
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable? ... Nukes?, John Carrier
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, george
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, I'll Always Be Here
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, I'll Always Be Here
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Richard Casady
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Dean A. Markley
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Duwop
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Duwop
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, YMC
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, David E. Powell
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, John Carrier
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, hcobb
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, John Carrier
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, kenney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jeff Dougherty
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Duwop
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, wrhamblen
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Dan
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Vaughn Simon
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Don Ocean
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Don Ocean
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, John Carrier
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andrew Swallow
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Duwop
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, YMC
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Dan
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, hcobb
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Andrew Swallow
      • Message not available
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Tiger
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, John Carrier
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, hcobb
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, John Carrier
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, hcobb
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, wrhamblen
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Raymond O'Hara
    • Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?, Arved Sandstrom
• Prophethood, mosa
  • Re: Prophethood, La N
    • Re: Prophethood, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Prophethood, ebe
• The Candidates as High Rollers, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Vaughn Simon
    • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, scott s.
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, La N.
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, La N
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Jeffrey Hamilton
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, scott s.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: The Candidates as High Rollers, dott.Piergiorgio
• Send in the Marines, hcobb
  • Re: Send in the Marines, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: Send in the Marines, hcobb
  • Re: Send in the Marines, David E. Powell
    • Re: Send in the Marines, tankfixer
    • Re: Send in the Marines, hcobb
      • Re: Send in the Marines, g lof2
      • Re: Send in the Marines, Jack Linthicum
• Shrine ruling prompts Jammu ire, PakistanPal
• Dealing with militancy, PakistanPal
• India worse than Pakistan, Bangladesh on nourishment, PakistanPal
• Kashmir towards Independence: The First Victory, PakistanPal
• India: Protect Honored Kashmiri Rights Lawyer From Attacks, PakistanPal
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, tankfixer
  • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, tankfixer
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, tankfixer
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Rich Johnson
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Rich Johnson
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Rich Johnson
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, tankfixer
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel, tankfixer
• Re: Sorta OT: Beirut restaurant: Buns and Guns, Dennis
• ACLU Releases Navy Files On Civilian Casualties In Iraq War, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Coast Guard Legend Jack Downey Retires After 41 Years, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served... BM1C James A Parrish, W2vm, Ksm, Cwm., Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• German destroyer Lutjens (D-185) in 1:250 scale, Alexander Blokhin
• Interesting space to find rt views from the Iraqi front, ebe
  • Re: Interesting space to find rt views from the Iraqi front, ebe
  • Re: Interesting space to find rt views from the Iraqi front, ebe
• U.S. satellites spying on Iraq, officials say, Jack Linthicum
• Prince William helps score drug haul, hcobb
  • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, William Black
    • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, hcobb
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, William Black
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, hcobb
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, William Black
  • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Tiger
  • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Sarah Czepiel
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, William Black
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, William Black
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, R.C. Payne
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Roger Conroy
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Sarah Czepiel
      • Re: Prince William helps score drug haul, Sarah Czepiel
• Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China?s Military, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China?s Military, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China's Military, Raymond O'Hara
• 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF NAVAL AVIATION, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy News Service for Tuesday, July 01, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Pentagon fights EPA on hazardous waste cleanups, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Weymouth native in Navy honored for work in Iraq, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Submarine find brings closure to man who never knew uncle, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The US reactivates the Navy Fourth Fleet, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Chertoff: Operational Eval Decisions Best Left to Coast Guard, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Military exercise in the Pacific targets China, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Happy Canuck Day!, BlackBeard
  • Re: Happy Canuck Day!, BF Lake
    • Re: Happy Canuck Day!, BlackBeard
• Re: Soviet Equavalent of SR-71 flights?, osr
• Re: Oops: USS Ronald Reagan leaves 100 sailors in Hong Kong, Sarah Czepiel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Oops: USS Ronald Reagan leaves 100 sailors in Hong Kong, Dan
    • Re: Oops: USS Ronald Reagan leaves 100 sailors in Hong Kong, Weatherlawyer
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, wrhamblen
  • Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, a425couple
  • Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, kenney
    • Re: Engine of CSS Alabama, Andrew Robert Breen
• Guns by Fisher, Raymond O'Hara
  • Re: Guns by Fisher, Barbarossa
    • Re: Guns by Fisher, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Michael Shirley
    • Re: Guns by Fisher, scott s.
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Richard Casady
  • Re: Guns by Fisher, a425couple
    • Re: Guns by Fisher, tankfixer
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, tankfixer
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Michael Shirley
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Richard Casady
      • Re: Guns by Fisher, Michael Shirley
• Destroyer 38-ק "Haifa" (ex-"Ibrahim el Awal"), Alexander Blokhin
  • Re: Destroyer 38-? "Haifa" (ex-"Ibrahim el Awal"), BF Lake
    • Re: Destroyer 38-? "Haifa" (ex-"Ibrahim el Awal"), Alexander Blokhin
• Re: 360 degree optics for submarine scopes?, Fred J . McCall
• Been there, done that, Jack Linthicum
• Kashmir: Mass protests force government to reverse controversial land-transfer decision, PakistanPal
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, tankfixer
    • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, tankfixer
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, tankfixer
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, tankfixer
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Peter Skelton
  • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, tankfixer
  • Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report, Jack Linthicum
• How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?, PakistanPal
  • Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?, guy
  • Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?, Andrew Swallow
    • Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?, Roger Conroy
      • Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?, Andrew Swallow
    • Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?, William Black
• Re: The Right Of The People...Shall Not Be Infringed, tankfixer
• “India” Balkanizing? Naxalite insurrection widening Cracks in deep cavities, PakistanPal
• Re: This would be a great movie, Raymond O'Hara
• The 2nd world revolution from Nepal? Another threat to India?, PakistanPal
• Navy News Service for Friday, June 27, 2008, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• General Clark Says McCain Oversold Navy Experience (Update1), Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• A Navy dream: retire in Maine, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• 50 Year Later, Nautilus Crew Still Feels It Could Repeat Polar Feat, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The new GI Bill: A study guide, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Naval Base San Diego Hosts Navy's Senior, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy Names New Amphibious Assault Ship America, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Bomb bomb bomb.....bomb Iran, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Bomb bomb bomb.....bomb Iran, Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Bomb bomb bomb.....bomb Iran, Jim Watt
• New U.S.S. America, dumpster4
  • Re: New U.S.S. America, Matt Wiser
    • Re: New U.S.S. America, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, Raymond O'Hara
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, BF Lake
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, Bob McKellar
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, BF Lake
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, TC Jordan
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, Peter Skelton
      • Re: New U.S.S. America, Tiger
    • Re: New U.S.S. America, Pete Granzeau
  • Re: New U.S.S. America, Matt Wiser
    • Re: New U.S.S. America, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: New U.S.S. America, Tiger
• Ships' visits promote military transparency, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Military to seek death penalty for USS Cole suspect, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, scott s.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, dott.Piergiorgio
    • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, Andrew Venor
      • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?, dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Bill Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Michael Shirley
    • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, William Black
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, William Black
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, deemsbill@xxxxxxx
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, William Black
    • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Bill Baker
  • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Matthew G . Saroff
    • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Matthew G . Saroff
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, dott.Piergiorgio
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Michael Shirley
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Michael Shirley
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, tankfixer
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, dumpster4
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, dumpster4
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Bill Baker
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, Kerryn Offord
      • Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM, tankfixer