sci.military.naval

• Thread Index

---

• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Fritz-X What-If
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: scott s.
• Re: Fritz-X What-If
  • From: mike
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: scott s.
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Judge Rules White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Vincent Brannigan
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: Tiger
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Tiger
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Tiger
• Re: A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Fritz-X What-If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Cap'n Crunch
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• For those who question political posts on this newsgroup
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: William Black
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: William Black
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: BF Lake
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: mike
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: La N
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: This would never happen in the United States Navy
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: frank
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Bush Orders Revamping Of Intelligence Gathering
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: kenney
• Re: Fritz-X What-If
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Navy News Service for Wednesday, July 30, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• USS GEORGE WASHINGTON - Navy cites smoking as likely cause of carrier fire that caused $70 million in damage
  • From: Cap'n Crunch
• A real littoral combat ship goes to sea with an Army crew
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: Don Ocean
• Musing about muzzleloaders
  • From: ohara5 . 0
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Pelosi: 'I'm trying to save the planet'
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: J
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Ken Chaddock
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: Dan
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: mike
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Austal coverup of LCS overruns discovered.
  • From: g lof2
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: scott s.
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: mike
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: mike
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: John Dallman
• This would never happen in the United States Navy
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: guy
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: kenney
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: mike
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Austal coverup of LCS overruns discovered.
  • From: hcobb
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: mike
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Vince Brannigan
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: mike
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Air Force nominee Schwartz faces questions about Iraq testimony
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Kerryn Offord
• Seminar on 1715 Treasure Fleet at Satellite Beach Library
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants
  • From: William Black
• C.I.A. Outlines Pakistan Links With Militants
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: guy
• Gorkhas of Assam support
  • From: PakistanPal
• Indian Politics: Wrong Foundations
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: kenney
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Pelosi: 'I'm trying to save the planet'
  • From: Cap'n Crunch
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: mike
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: ACR-4 -- USS Pennsylvania/ USS Pittsburgh
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: ACR-4 -- USS Pennsylvania/ USS Pittsburgh
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: ACR-4 -- USS Pennsylvania/ USS Pittsburgh
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: More than 22,000 veterans sought help from suicide hot line in its first year, government says
  • From: Kerryn Offord
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: Dan
• Wilmington recognized as Coast Guard City
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The Untold Story of the Cold War's Most Daring Mission
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Golez appointed new chief of Philippine Navy
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Parade of Ships join Coast Guard Festival
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy commander fired after running ship aground
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Italian submarine arriving at Norfolk Naval Station Friday
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Russia sets submarine depth record
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served... Otto J Ernst, W2vm,
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: William Black
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Importance of Malta WWII
  • From: Rich Johnson
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos
  • From: William Black
• Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos
  • From: William Black
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: More than 22,000 veterans sought help from suicide hot line in its first year, government says
  • From: La N
• Re: RIMPAC ends
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• RIMPAC ends
  • From: John Szalay
• Not quite O.T. as it is booze related
  • From: La N
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jeff Crowell
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967
  • From: William Black
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• A Counterinsurgency Guide for Politicos
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• More than 22,000 veterans sought help from suicide hot line in its first year, government says
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: kenney
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: guy
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: guy
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Comment: Should Buddha smile again? —Zawar Abidi
  • From: PakistanPal
• Indian PM Singh wins trust vote in Parliament but Opp says it is victory of horse-trading
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Barbarossa
• Russia To Revamp Navy With New Aircraft Carriers And Submarines
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The Sinking of the USS Indianapolis
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy Cancels Battleship, Tough Choices Ahead Mike Burleson
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• More sailors needed for Canada's warships, navy brass says
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• First World War submarine moved after 90 years
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Russian Navy Talks Carriers on Annual Fleet Day
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy veterans tribute bill lands in Congress
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: nik Simpson
• No scuttle at Scapa
  • From: ohara5 . 0
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: What If
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: tankfixer
• Pentagon flexes its altruism muscle
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: idontexist
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Rich Johnson
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Peter Stickney
• Re: Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: William Black
• Laid off submarine workers learning to deal cards
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: george
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: ohara5 . 0
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• FREE Vietnam War Memorial Wall Card
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served...PO2C Carl D Lowery, Vwae, Ndsm, Cwm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Rich Johnson
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• womens lib comes to Iraq.
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Brian Williams interview with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NBC
  • From: guy
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Brian Williams interview with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NBC
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Brian Williams interview with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, NBC
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Alan Lothian
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: tankfixer
• New Produced Luxury Residence - Classified Preview 2008/11
  • From: rogerkolsson@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Issue Requirements: Acknowledgement of Responsibility Award
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• more bush crimes pelosi will ignore.
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: ohara5 . 0
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: William Black
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Black powder, not a naval topic though
  • From: ohara5 . 0
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: David E. Powell
• Rhode Island: Russian sub raised from river
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: guy
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• I Served...PO3C Esther M Rosales, Cwm, Swasm, Gcm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• ssue Regulations: The Antarctica Service Medal
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Service Dress Khaki May Be Coming Back
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: British Newspaper Makes Fun Of & Mocks Barack Obama
  • From: Jim Yanik
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: Dean A. Markley
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Peter Stickney
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: John Szalay
• People's Republic Newgroup
  • From: eyeball
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: a425couple
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Service Dress Khaki May Be Coming Back
  • From: ropeyarn@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Tiger
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Tiger
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: William Black
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: David Biddulph
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Jim E
• Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV
  • From: frank
• Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV
  • From: David E. Powell
• Alaska fishing boats and submarines
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Brzezinski: McCain would start WWIV
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: McCain out to sink LCS
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: La N
• Re: O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• O.T. - More wacky news from Florida
  • From: La N
• Re: McCain out to sink LCS
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: McCain out to sink LCS
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Issue Regulations: Vietnam Campaign Medal (U.S. and Allied)
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: guy
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Peter Skelton
• McCain out to sink LCS
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama Scraps Visit To Wounded Troops
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Navy's top admiral urges less talk, more action on diversity
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Navy News Service for Friday, July 25, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Vietnam-era Navy river patrol boat available for tours during
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Aussie submarine sinks retired US warship
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy chaplain faces rape, assault charges
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• MILITARY: 'Pacific Strike' moving heavy gear from ship to shore
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Residents plan protest of RimPac military exercise
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Tiger
• aliban Exploit Sectarian Rift in Siege of Shiites in Pakistan Enclave
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: george
• Generics Monopoly in the making , neocon landgrab , tax evasion and foreign armies
  • From: fusion
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Barbara Schwarz finally talks about the government again
  • From: APP interviews
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: frank
• Re: Shaped Charge -more ASW
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: William Black
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: William Black
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Tiger
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: guy
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: William Black
• Russia denies reported Cuba base plans
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Russian "Aircraft Carrier Killer" Cruiser begins Arctic patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Don Ocean
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: g lof2
• Re: What If
  • From: Peter Stickney
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967
  • From: Jewdas
• Re: U.S. Navy Ticonderoga- class cruiser fires Tomahawk Block IV missile
  • From: frank
• Re: The Liberty Incident 1967
  • From: Don Ocean
• 24 Jul 2008 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• 21st Century 'Battleship' Sunk!
  • From: Dan Olecki
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• U.S. Navy Ticonderoga- class cruiser fires Tomahawk Block IV missile
  • From: yeknom-ecaps
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: William Black
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: scott s.
• Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: David Biddulph
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: guy
• Re: Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Sorry everyone - here is a naval question
  • From: guy
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: William Black
• Re: Interesting advert
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Interesting advert
  • From: William Black
• Mk. 48 Mod 7 CBASS Torpedo Test Shot
  • From: dumpster4
• New study estimates vast supplies of Arctic oil, gas, 90 Bbbl
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: A naval love story
  • From: a425couple
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• A naval love story
  • From: La N
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Navy all at sea about LCS crew details
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: High-Stakes Race to Unlock a Wider Web; Critics Say New Technology May Hinder TV Signals
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Happy Birthday, Raymond Chandler
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• High-Stakes Race to Unlock a Wider Web; Critics Say New Technology May Hinder TV Signals
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Hunting Season Supplier
  • From: Mutual Assets
• No Singh song this
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: g lof2
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Lyle
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Kerryn Offord
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• USCG/Cocaine Bust
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Report: Pentagon auditors pressured to 'skew' reports on military
  • From: frank
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Rell Bolsters Efforts To Protect Submarine Base
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy scraps new destroyer, to build older models
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Coast Guard to get new cutter
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US Navy Conducts Flight Test of Tomahawk Block IV Missile
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• WWII museum plans more focus on subs
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Report: Pentagon auditors pressured to 'skew' reports on military
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Issue Regulations: Occupation Service Medal - Army, Navy, Marine
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• After 60 years, black officers rare
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Navy all at sea about LCS crew details
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: Oil Price Drops $6.44/Barrel (only 4.4 % )-- Bush had nothing to do with it -- supply and demand at work
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Oil Price Drops $6.44/Barrel (only 4.4 % )-- Bush had nothing to do with it -- supply and demand at work
  • From: Jim Yanik
• Re: What If
  • From: guy
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: hcobb
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Generals sweat (literally) out the health-care interogation
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: William Black
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Tiger
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: What If
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: Tiger
• Re: 15 percent of women in the military have suffered sexual trauma.
  • From: Tiger
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: Future U.S. Navy Shipbuilding
  • From: Tiger
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Importance of Madrid conference
  • From: PakistanPal
• Future U.S. Navy Shipbuilding
  • From: Dan Olecki
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: frank
• Re: 15 percent of women in the military have suffered sexual trauma.
  • From: frank
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: David Lesher
• Re: What If
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: William Hamblen
• 15 percent of women in the military have suffered sexual trauma.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Is It Time to Segregate the Military By Sex
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: frank
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: What If
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: g lof2
• Obama and McCain flew in Ospreys
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: nik Simpson
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: scott s.
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Issue Regulations: Coast Guard Achievement
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• List Of Military Discussion/Info-Sharing Groups
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: What If
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: What If
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: What If
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Our very own War Criminal
  • From: frank
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Army slow to process injuries
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: David Lesher
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: William Black
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: mike
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: William Black
• Our very own War Criminal
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Navy resigned as DD(X) sinks
  • From: hcobb
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: kenney
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Foreign military ships blocked in Odesa port during three hours
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Servicemembers hear perspectives of 'women in the military'
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• I Served...S2C William F Hale, W2vm, Phm, Hd.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Sinking of Mutsu, June 1943
  • From: Dean A. Markley
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Jeff Dougherty
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: guy
• Re: NOAA goes diving for U-boats in North Carolina: "It's really the only place where you can visit the battlefield of the Atlantic."
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• CNN Short bit on Persian Gulf patrols
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• NOAA goes diving for U-boats in North Carolina: "It's really the only place where you can visit the battlefield of the Atlantic."
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: John Szalay
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• I Served...CPL Ronald L Gronau, Vsm, Ndsm, Cwm
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Says Drill! Drill! Drill! -- Oil Price Drops $9/Barrel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Says Drill! Drill! Drill! -- Oil Price Drops $9/Barrel
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: William Black
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: John Mianowski
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: John Szalay
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• For 'Surge' Troops, Pride Mingles With Doubt
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• B-52 bomber crashes near Guam, crew missing.
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• EU convoys through the Gulf of Aden
  • From: hcobb
• Re: The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• The History of the nuclear submarine before Rickover
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Riddle of Lusitania sinking may finally be solved; American entrepreneur Gregg Bemis finally gets courts go-ahead to explore the wreck off Ireland
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Many military officers are pushing back against Defense Secretary Gates' focus on preparing for more 'asymmetric' fighting rather than for a large, conventional conflict.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Nazi Krauthammer = the exterminable fascist
  • From: Dennis
• Re: vvv
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: satire?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Andrew Venor
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Navy News Service for Friday, July 18, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy News Service for Thursday, July 17, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Ken Chaddock
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Dan
• Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Issue Regulations: China War Memorial Medal
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Launching of the first Class 209PN Submarine for the Portuguese
  • From: amg
• Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• satire?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: frank
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: President Bush Demonstrates The Power Of The Bully Pulpit -- He Says Drill! Drill! Drill! -- Oil Price Drops $9/Barrel
  • From: frank
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: What If
  • From: Peter Stickney
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: YMC
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Captain America Clone Considered for Movie Role. Steve Rogers in the flesh? You decide!
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: guy
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Stolen Laptops - Juststolen.Net
  • From: Crime reporting group
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Captain America Clone Considered for Movie Role. Steve Rogers in the flesh? You decide!
  • From: Brenda Blog
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Issue Regulations: Republic of Vietnam Wound Medal
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Leadfoot
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: talk talk talk talk. We look like cowards!
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: What If
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Dan
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Dan
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: William Black
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Warships as war graves?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Warships as war graves?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: La N
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: John Dallman
• Arctic Oil Rush: the Naval Aspect
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Now al Maliki agrees with Obama, not Bush or his Press Secretary
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: guy
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: What If
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: guy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Leadfoot
• New Navy uniform goes retro
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Kennebunk woman retraces steps of veteran father
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Mexican navy tows a drug-smuggling submarine to shore with cocaine
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Happy Homecoming for Navy pilots
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Fire in Submarine in Groton Under Investigation
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Midshipmen embed with Marines on CARAT, taste Corps life
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Effort is delayed in raising Russian submarine that sank in
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Drug submarine?
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Dennis
• I Served... LCPL Donald P Gouthro, Vsm, Vcog, Cwm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Phil Gramm given the boot
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Jim Yanik
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jim Yanik
• I Served... BM3 Richard H Hamming
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: guy
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: William Hamblen
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Pete Granzeau
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Drug submarine?
  • From: Airyx
• President Bush, or maybe just his Press Secretary, says agreements now under negotiation to include a general time horizon for meeting aspirational goals
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: What If
  • From: ebe
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: William Black
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• For those who have landed in Subic
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: "Freedom fries" die as France embraces the hamburger
  • From: Tiger
• Re: What If
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Drug submarine?
  • From: Tiger
• Al-Qaida draws more foreign recruits to Afghan war
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Terrorism Funds May Let Brass Fly in Style
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Kerryn Offord
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: guy
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: What If
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Drug submarine?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Drug submarine?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Drug submarine?
  • From: brandon
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Dennis
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: What If
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Bill Baker
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Kennedy In The Cuban Missile Crisis
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Oral tradition, what it is, what it ain't. was On the need for Poets and Poetry after TSHTF
  • From: Dennis
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: "Freedom fries" die as France embraces the hamburger
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: What If
  • From: William Black
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: What If
  • From: ebe
• Re: What If
  • From: ebe
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: David Loewe, Jr.
• What If
  • From: ebe
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Warspite
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: g lof2
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• "Freedom fries" die as France embraces the hamburger
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Warspite
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• I say we all chip in and buy Hines one of these
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: William Black
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Jim Yanik
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• US plans to station diplomats in Iran for first time since 1979
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: kenney
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Another reason they call it "The Silent Service"
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: hcobb
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Disenfathomabilia.
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Dan
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Billzz
• I Served... SGT Dennis M Witt
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Canada Deports U.S. Deserter Who Opposes Iraq War
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: tankfixer
• Navy News Service for Wednesday, July 16, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Senate committee approves Coast Guard spending bill
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Sub named after Granite State can be tracked online
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Launching of the first Class 209PN Submarine for the Portuguese
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Analysis: East Fleet prepares -- Part 1
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: David Loewe, Jr.
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Where were you on September 11th 2001?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Shore duty for the SM-3
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• War and Peacetime Military Event Chronology
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Military Glossary and Dictionary
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: hcobb
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Pete Granzeau
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: ebe
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: guy
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• US envoy to meet Iranian nuke negotiator
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Iran Says Deterring Foes, to Hold Air Force Drill
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: guy
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: guy
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: g lof2
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: tankfixer
• US Navy: 30 tons of narcotics seized in Gulf, cutting off possible
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• 'Filipinos in the US Navy & Coast Guard During the Vietnam War
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Tiger
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: g lof2
• Re: Lady Thatcher To Be Honoured With State Funeral - First For PM
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: Lady Thatcher To Be Honoured With State Funeral - First For PM
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: William Black
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: guy
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Pete Granzeau
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Irony
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: hcobb
• blue-on-blue: mineweepers sunk off French coast 1944?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• blue on blue: minesweeper squadron sunk in 1944?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: guy
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• 14 Jul 2008 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Want to catch a president?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Want to catch a president?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Navy Turns On Its Super-Destroyer
  • From: dumpster4
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Shape- into PoW ?
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Irony
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Irony
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Kerryn Offord
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: guy
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: guy
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Irony
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Irony
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: European parliament passes resolution against mass graves in Kashmir
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• European parliament passes resolution against mass graves in Kashmir
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Irony
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Irony
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Ken Chaddock
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Irony
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Dean A. Markley
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: CJ Adams
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Shaped Charge into PoW ?
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Yellow submarine: Unmanned sub studies ocean as it glides to Spain
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Not all LCS to be defended against terrorist attack
  • From: hcobb
• Fourth Fleet reporting for duty
  • From: hcobb
• New Saudi Arabia university will have a Western feel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Iran will target US bases if attacked
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• China 'is fuelling war in Darfur'
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Rich Johnson
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Kerryn Offord
• Re: Rakkaus voittaa?
  • From: Ilppo Kuisma
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Rich Johnson
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Per Nordenberg
• Army Secretary Asks for Probe of Firing of Arlington Cemetary. Public Affairs Officer
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Taki Kogoma
• Issue Regulations: The Vietnam War Era Service Recognition
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andre Ilausky
• Re: Pearl Harbour. This is in response to a post from Otis Willie. There is no need to respond to the OP.
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Shaped Charge in Naval Artillery
  • From: sappr67@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Pearl Harbour. This is in response to a post from Otis Willie. There is no need to respond to the OP.
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Roger Conroy
• US Navy Revives Command for Latin America, Caribbean
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US Navy Establishing First Ever Major Presence in SA
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Congress Calls On Experts To Formulate New "Grand Military Strategy
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jim Yanik
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Greek Sea Looted by Divers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Expedition to Survey Sunken U-Boats Off North Carolina
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The Persian Paradox: Why is so much sensitive US military technology winding up in Iran? "
  • From: David E. Powell
• Never O.T. in this group - Beer (is there anything it can't do?)
  • From: La N
• Book Report and more
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Rich Johnson
• A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: vvv
  • From: Don Ocean
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Greek Sea Looted by Divers
  • From: kenney
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: vvv
  • From: ebe
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: vvv
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ]
  • From: ebe
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: vvv
  • From: ebe
• Re: Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: vvv
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: The Persian Paradox: Why is so much sensitive US military technology winding up in Iran? "
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Iran's Photoshop missile arm
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ]
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: ironduff003
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Fourth public affairs director in a recent years gets fired, thought the families of the dead should control media attention not the Army.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• The Persian Paradox: Why is so much sensitive US military technology winding up in Iran? "
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Luxury Saudi prison camp
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sub-launched UAVs...
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• IRAM = RPG + IED
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Luxury Saudi prison camp
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ]
  • From: ebe
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Dollar hit by Iranian missile
  • From: hcobb
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Luxury Saudi prison camp
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Dollar hit by Iranian missile
  • From: Mark Test
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Ken Chaddock
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Justin
• Senate Approves Telecom Bill: Now Mil has authority to act (Use it wisely and justly) [Goal to restore Peace and Domestic Tranquility as per the US Constitution ]
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Test Post - Am I Being Spiked
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: War with Iran = Global Catastrophe - Culling the Global Herd in Favour of the Very Rich in America
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: British and American Black Ops in Iraq: State-Sponsored Terror - the Killing of Innocents so they can "respond" to Terrorism
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Justin
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Good article on the Staights and Iran
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• OVS Medal: Red Cross seeks military call center volunteers
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: David V. Loewe, Jr
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: FYI Iran
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• FYI Iran
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Duwop
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable? ... Nukes?
  • From: John Carrier
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: The . Sargon
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: John Carrier
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Don Ocean
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Don Ocean
• Dollar hit by Iranian missile
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: Tiger
• The “Angry Hindus” And The Muslims
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Russians reflect on Afghan conflict
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Pakistan rejects Kabul bombing link
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Jeff
• Is India Pakistan’s nemesis?
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• A CRISIS OF POLICY AND THE SOVEREIGNTY QUESTION
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: mike
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• DD-214 Discharge and Re-enlistment Codes Online
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Issue Regulations: Combat Action Awards
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Robert Sveinson
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Issue Regulations: Vietnam Campaign Medal
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Indian Navy ship to be immortalised as artificial reef
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Indian Naval chief visits France ahead of global submarine tenders
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Duwop
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Issue Regulations: Primary Leadership Development Ribbon
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Duwop
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Duwop
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Test Post - Am I Being Spiked
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Ken Chaddock
• Re: Telecom bill (I support the Feingold Amendment to this Bill)
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Domestic spying quietly goes on; NSA faces new limits, but surveillance thrives
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Pentagon says it's moving some strike jets to worrisome Afghan mission as Iraq improves
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: William Black
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Iran to burn down its vital interests around the globe
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: hcobb
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• The War In The Pacific
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Delaware Takes Part in Navy Week
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Reporting from Iraq: Seabees battle heat, family separation at
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre
  • From: Matt Wiser
• US holds navy exercise after Iran comments on Gulf
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Last Vietnam combat veteran in Coast Guard's ranks retiring
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• USS Nimiz; made for tv military
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Comments on the Wire tapping Immunity Bill
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Ken Chaddock
• Comments on the Wire tapping Immunity Bill
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• More than you will probably ever want to know about whales and sonar
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: I'll Always Be Here
• Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: wrhamblen
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: wrhamblen
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Where the fnord is the LCS?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: I'll Always Be Here
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: William Black
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Michael Shirley
• SURVEY: Should the United States Pre-emptively Attack Iran?
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• The Iraq war movie: Military hopes to shape genre
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Where the fnord is the LCS?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Bob L
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: kenney
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: kenney
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: John
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• ASDIC hut saved from demolition
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: What would people say
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Rum, the Lash and...
  • From: William Black
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Tiger
• Re: What would people say
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Israel Has A Year To Stop Iran Bomb, Warns Ex-Spy
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Tiger
• Japanese Suicide Boats
  • From: John
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: What would people say
  • From: Mark Sieving
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: What would people say
  • From: ebe
• Re: What would people say
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: What would people say
  • From: ebe
• What would people say
  • From: ebe
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: Re: Ron Paul: I hear members of Congress saying “i
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: george
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: French Submarines in the Mediterranean - 1917
  • From: Starshiy
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Dean A. Markley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Dean A. Markley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Randy Massachusetts Schoolgirls Abuse Innocent Boys.
  • From: John Doe
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Malcolm \"Mal\" Reynolds
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jeff Dougherty
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: John Carrier
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: William Black
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Pete Granzeau
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• I Served... MMC Brys Richard L, Gcm, Cwm, Vsm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Jeff Dougherty
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: William Black
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: William Black
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Project: 1135 (Burevestnik) "Deyatelny". NATO Class Name: "Krivak I"
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: French Submarines in the Mediterranean - 1917
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: A Tale of Two Subs
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: guy
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Dean A. Markley
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: John Carrier
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Paul J. Adam
• French Submarines in the Mediterranean - 1917
  • From: sappr67@xxxxxxxxxxx
• UK aircraft carriers
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: hcobb
• Colorado Seabees turn over keys to help
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• US Navy has adopted new rules to help protect marine mammals
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Oops: USS Ronald Reagan leaves 100 sailors in Hong Kong
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Rimpac Attracts Ten Nations; Largest Military Excercise
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Sarah Czepiel
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Michael Shirley
• I Served... CPL Jason G Huhman, Gwera, Ndsm, Gcm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: wrhamblen
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Matthew G . Saroff
• Looking for people who served who served in the military...
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat
  • From: kenney
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: A Tale of Two Subs
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: Andrew Venor
• Re: A Tale of Two Subs
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: William Black
• I Served... LCPL James F Klein, Vsm, Vcog, Cwm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: David Lesher
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: A Tale of Two Subs
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• A Tale of Two Subs
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: wrhamblen
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Jeffrey Hamilton
• Project: 1135 (Burevestnik) "Deyatelny". NATO Class Name: "Krivak I" in 1:250 scale.
  • From: Alexander Blokhin
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Derek Lyons
• Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China's Military
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: John Carrier
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: William Black
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Saudi Arabia to buy French frigate for kickbacks
  • From: hcobb
• US Navy spends more for less.
  • From: hcobb
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: Sea Invasion
  • From: John Dallman
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Lawmaker Rules Out 2008 Approval of U.S.-Indian Deal
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Challenge to India's secular traditions
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: g lof2
• Navy News Service for Thursday, July 03, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Air Force, Navy JAGs nominated for third star
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: scott s.
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: David Lesher
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: YMC
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: BF Lake
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Precisely (Non political, non religious) What is the definition of a state secret
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Precisely (Non political, non religious) What is the definition of a state secret
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Precisely (Non political, non religious) What is the definition of a state secret
  • From: ebe
• Re: WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: ebe
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Richard Casady
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Sarah Czepiel
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Rich Johnson
• Re: Prophethood
  • From: ebe
• WWII Convoy Ops query
  • From: David Lesher
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: John Carrier
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: La N
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: La N.
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: scott s.
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: William Black
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Keith Willshaw
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: YMC
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: David E. Powell
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Vaughn Simon
• Re: Prophethood
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Japanese Military Strategy in the Pacific War: Was Defeat Inevitable?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Prophethood
  • From: La N
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: wrhamblen
• Prophethood
  • From: mosa
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: William Black
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: R.C. Payne
• Re: Send in the Marines
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• The Candidates as High Rollers
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: William Black
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Roger Conroy
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: hcobb
• Send in the Marines
  • From: hcobb
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Shrine ruling prompts Jammu ire
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: kenney
• Dealing with militancy
  • From: PakistanPal
• India worse than Pakistan, Bangladesh on nourishment
  • From: PakistanPal
• Kashmir towards Independence: The First Victory
  • From: PakistanPal
• India: Protect Honored Kashmiri Rights Lawyer From Attacks
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: Sink a Destroyer, 4 PM History Channel
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China?s Military
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: tankfixer
• Re: Oops: USS Ronald Reagan leaves 100 sailors in Hong Kong
  • From: Dan
• Re: Sorta OT: Beirut restaurant: Buns and Guns
  • From: Dennis
• Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Matthew G . Saroff
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: TC Jordan
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Sarah Czepiel
• ACLU Releases Navy Files On Civilian Casualties In Iraq War
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Coast Guard Legend Jack Downey Retires After 41 Years
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: Tiger
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Destroyer 38-? "Haifa" (ex-"Ibrahim el Awal")
  • From: Alexander Blokhin
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Tiger
• Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China?s Military
  • From: Mark Borgerson
• Re: Happy Canuck Day!
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: scott s.
• Re: Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: William Black
• I Served... BM1C James A Parrish, W2vm, Ksm, Cwm.
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military
  • From: Arved Sandstrom
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Pete Granzeau
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: dott.Piergiorgio
• German destroyer Lutjens (D-185) in 1:250 scale
  • From: Alexander Blokhin
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Interesting space to find rt views from the Iraqi front
  • From: ebe
• Re: Interesting space to find rt views from the Iraqi front
  • From: ebe
• Interesting space to find rt views from the Iraqi front
  • From: ebe
• U.S. satellites spying on Iraq, officials say
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Prince William helps score drug haul
  • From: hcobb
• Quake Revealed Deficiencies of China’s Military
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?
  • From: William Black
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Bomb bomb bomb.....bomb Iran
  • From: Jim Watt
• Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?
  • From: Roger Conroy
• 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF NAVAL AVIATION
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy News Service for Tuesday, July 01, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Pentagon fights EPA on hazardous waste cleanups
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Weymouth native in Navy honored for work in Iraq
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Submarine find brings closure to man who never knew uncle
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The US reactivates the Navy Fourth Fleet
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Chertoff: Operational Eval Decisions Best Left to Coast Guard
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Military exercise in the Pacific targets China
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Guns by Fisher
  • From: Barbarossa
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: BF Lake
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Bill Baker
• Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Bill Baker
• Re: Happy Canuck Day!
  • From: BF Lake
• Re: Bomb bomb bomb.....bomb Iran
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Happy Canuck Day!
  • From: BlackBeard
• Re: Soviet Equavalent of SR-71 flights?
  • From: osr
• Re: Oops: USS Ronald Reagan leaves 100 sailors in Hong Kong
  • From: Sarah Czepiel
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Peter Skelton
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Andrew Chaplin
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Bob McKellar
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: BF Lake
• Re: Engine of CSS Alabama
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Pete Granzeau
• Guns by Fisher
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: Destroyer 38-? "Haifa" (ex-"Ibrahim el Awal")
  • From: BF Lake
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: William Black
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: William Black
• Destroyer 38-ק "Haifa" (ex-"Ibrahim el Awal")
  • From: Alexander Blokhin
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Re: 360 degree optics for submarine scopes?
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: William Black
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
• Been there, done that
  • From: Jack Linthicum
• Kashmir: Mass protests force government to reverse controversial land-transfer decision
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Michael Shirley
• Re: U.S. Escalating Covert Operations Against Iran: Report
  • From: NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?
  • From: guy
• How long to extirpate penury in India? 300 years to end poverty?
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: The Right Of The People...Shall Not Be Infringed
  • From: tankfixer
• “India” Balkanizing? Naxalite insurrection widening Cracks in deep cavities
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: This would be a great movie
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• The 2nd world revolution from Nepal? Another threat to India?
  • From: PakistanPal
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Raymond O'Hara
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Navy News Service for Friday, June 27, 2008
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• General Clark Says McCain Oversold Navy Experience (Update1)
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• A Navy dream: retire in Maine
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• 50 Year Later, Nautilus Crew Still Feels It Could Repeat Polar Feat
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• The new GI Bill: A study guide
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Naval Base San Diego Hosts Navy's Senior
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Navy Names New Amphibious Assault Ship America
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Bomb bomb bomb.....bomb Iran
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: New U.S.S. America
  • From: Matt Wiser
• New U.S.S. America
  • From: dumpster4
• Ships' visits promote military transparency
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Military to seek death penalty for USS Cole suspect
  • From: Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
• Re: Japanese Destroyers in the Mediterranean - 1917 ?
  • From: scott s.
• Re: China Close to Anti-Ship BM
  • From: Paul J. Adam