Re: Battleships...again......
- From: "deemsbill@xxxxxxx" <deemsbill@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 9, 1:17 pm, "BF Lake" <non...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<deemsb...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4ad00bef-3d64-496d-96ea-
> I disagree. The torpedo has always been the worst aerial enemy of
even the biggest ships.
But that didn't stop the carrier from continuing to exist, and it has the
same problem as a BB hull for that. Didn't Andy just post that test
bombing of NELSON's deck got the LION's cancelled?
Regards,
Barry
Carriers had greater strike capabilities than battleships. That's
why they replaced them. Put 4 bombs on the deck of my battleship and
I'll put 4 torps into the hull of your battleship. I'd be willing to
bet the odds that my battleship would still be underway and at least
partially mission capable are greater than yours.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: BF Lake
- Re: Battleships...again......
- References:
- Nuclear-Powered DDG?
- From: dumpster4
- Re: Nuclear-Powered DDG?
- From: TMOliver
- Re: Nuclear-Powered DDG?
- From: Andre Lieven
- Battleships...again......
- From: Dean A. Markley
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: Andrew Robert Breen
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: Dean A. Markley
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: Gernot Hassenpflug
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: dott.Piergiorgio
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: BF Lake
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: deemsbill@xxxxxxx
- Re: Battleships...again......
- From: BF Lake
- Nuclear-Powered DDG?
- Prev by Date: Re: Battleships...again......
- Next by Date: Re: Battleships...again......
- Previous by thread: Re: Battleships...again......
- Next by thread: Re: Battleships...again......
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|