Re: Iraq scenario #1
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Oct 2007 03:37:43 GMT
Fred J. McCall <fmccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1agdh31pe93k0hjl7qjoppt2tss9itmumt@xxxxxxx:
ebe <miniskirt7a@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
:If Turkey invades Iraq to solve the PKK problem, we can forget about a
:unified Iraq. Instead it will be a partition Iraq, possible three
:countries if it continues over 3 years with the Kurish area being a
:Turkish client state, a Shia Iraqi state, and a Sunni Iraq state.
:
If Turkey invades Iraq I suspect we would see another military
conflict between NATO members, with one of them being us.
If Turkey thinks the US House passing some silly resolution
identifying Armenia as a genocide creates friction with them, let them
be stupid enough to do anything other than talk about invading Iraq to
see what 'problems between us' really look like.
it still irks me that the DemocRATs are so traitorous as to pull this shit.
Anything to sabotage the US war effort,just to make Bush fail.
and they have the NERVE to say they want to make other nations like us
again,that they would be better diplomatically.
They are truly despicable.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iraq scenario #1
- From: Vince
- Re: Iraq scenario #1
- From: Tiger
- Re: Iraq scenario #1
- References:
- Iraq scenario #1
- From: ebe
- Re: Iraq scenario #1
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Iraq scenario #1
- Prev by Date: Re: USN armoured cruisers post 1922
- Next by Date: Re: Iraq scenario #1
- Previous by thread: Re: Iraq scenario #1
- Next by thread: Re: Iraq scenario #1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
