Re: Effect of Graf Zeppelin if Operational?

On Oct 12, 12:50 pm, Andre Lieven <andrelie...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 12, 12:26 pm, guy <guyswetten...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 12 Oct, 17:42, Brad Meyer <bradm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:41:54 -0500, "TMOliver"

<tmoliverjr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<ken...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...

jkauppin.NOS...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jukka O. Kauppinen) wrote:

Nothing different from any other day. 109 was very stable and gentle
plane in landing pattern.

The reference is probably down the known weakness in the landing gear.
In addition the narrow track of the gear made manoeuvring them on the
ground difficult. Not good traits in carrier aircraft.

Given the well known problems deck handling Seafires with their narrow track
outward folding gear . . .

In this respect, it is worth noting that for all their experience the
British were not fully succesfull in "navalizing" the Spitfire. In
fact, I can't think of a single instance of anyone successfully
navalizing an a/c designed for land based use.

Pup,
1 & 1/2 strutter
Camel
Nimrod
Sea Mosquito
Sea Hornet
Sea Fury
Sea Hawk
Sea Venom
arguably Sea Vixen / DH110
Sea Harrier

strangely all from the Tom Sopwith/DeHavilland stable...

thats my first shot at purely british ones, in about 30 secs...

Note that, one, half of your examples come from after 1940,
and the pre 1940 planes were all ones where landing speeds
and airborne speeds were low, making free launches and
landings from a carrier easy.

Neither point applies to a BF-109 on a carrier. Plus, the
Germans, unlike the RN, *had never done any of this
before*.

Even the well experienced Brits, didn't do that well with a
navalised narrrow undercart fighter: Spit/Seafire...

I doubt the Germans
were going to get it right first time out of the box. They are not
going to know what doesn't work until they test it at sea.

Even assuming they finished the GZ they would still be years
away from having an oeprational air group.

Yep.

Andre

Just back from debriefing the Capital City, but has anyone spoken of
the Me-155 yet?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_155
http://www.xs4all.nl/~tozu/me109/family/me155.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Village/4082/int_air/bv155-1.htm
http://www.geocities.com/pentagon/2833/luftwaffe/carrierborne/carrierborne.html

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Effect of Graf Zeppelin if Operational?
    ... plane in landing pattern. ... In addition the narrow track of the gear made manoeuvring them on the ... Not good traits in carrier aircraft. ... Sea Mosquito ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: The Poison Sky - spoilers
    ... A carrier has destroyers, anti-submarine warfare ships and submarines themselves steaming with it wherever the carrier goes to create a bubble hundreds of miles around it to make sure nothing can get at the relatively lumberingly slow carrier itself. ... All it needs to do is get within 10 miles at sea and that's the end of the US navy with no civilian casualties. ... The Nukes only have to get within 10 miles and the EMP will fry the avionics and the shock will sink the entire fleet. ... With the navy taken out and that will be the first target of any attack the US is totally powerless to retaliate against any rouge state and terrorise it like it did to Serbia or Iraq. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: The Poison Sky - spoilers
    ... A carrier has destroyers, anti-submarine warfare ships and submarines themselves steaming with it wherever the carrier goes to create a bubble hundreds of miles around it to make sure nothing can get at the relatively lumberingly slow carrier itself. ... All it needs to do is get within 10 miles at sea and that's the end of the US navy with no civilian casualties. ... And constant Combat Air Patrol flights combined with E-2 Hawkeyes and other radar assets give a carrier group very long range warning of inbound attacks. ... With the navy taken out and that will be the first target of any attack the US is totally powerless to retaliate against any rouge state and terrorise it like it did to Serbia or Iraq. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: The Poison Sky - spoilers
    ... A carrier has destroyers, anti-submarine warfare ships and submarines themselves steaming with it wherever the carrier goes to create a bubble hundreds of miles around it to make sure nothing can get at the relatively lumberingly slow carrier itself. ... All it needs to do is get within 10 miles at sea and that's the end of the US navy with no civilian casualties. ... And constant Combat Air Patrol flights combined with E-2 Hawkeyes and other radar assets give a carrier group very long range warning of inbound attacks. ... Since there's only a couple of aircraft carriers at seas out of the 12 the US has at any time, it would have to be a terrific sucker punch to take out the US navy. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Luftwaffe operating in Scotland now... was "aircraft carriers and wooden decks"
    ... Sea against Germany, then by definition Britain must be neutral, otherwise ... a USN carrier fleet is cruising in the North ... "But a first class land-based air force like the Luftwaffe (or even the ...
    (soc.history.war.world-war-ii)
Loading